Forum Moderators: open
nope, not for me. have tons of relevant, useful content. which google seemed to love for many months.
You're obviously missing something. Look deeper.
[edited by: satanclaus at 3:18 pm (utc) on Nov. 19, 2003]
Even taking into account the observation that big authority sites are doing better and therefore the toal number of sites in high positions has decreased - there must be an awful lot of winners in this update. 1 page dropping out of the top 10 results in someone else's page coming into the top 10. I don't hear much from these winners.
If you guys also have some other experience with Florida update share it.
Please be more technical rather than start crying abt your website without reasoning:)
AND FOR GG WILL THERE BE REGULAR UPDATE AS USUAL OR THESE REULTS WILL BE THERE FOR A MONTH.
thanks for your suggestion
Deepak
Absolutely not. I can show you a (competitive) search where the only thing that puts the site where it is what is in the META KEYWORDS tag! Not backlinks (yes I've also checked ATW), not hidden text, not cloaking, not hub status blah, blah, blah - purely META KEYWORD stuffing!
I'm quite prepared to provide the example. In fact, I challenge any poster asserting that the current results are unquestionable in their quality to take a look; should they find the legitimate reason why such a result exists based on the merits of either on page, or off page factors then they are quite welcome to reply to this post stating I talk absolute b*******s (stating their reasoning obviously)!
If no such poster is prepared to take the challenge then they should refrain from being smug.
I don't assert that Google is broken or I, or anyone else, deserve to be placed in the #1 spot - just that there are plenty of examples of totally irrelevent results.
It is starting to appear that this new update has only changed the "profitable" search phrases - this info is easily available to G from their ADWORDS program. So if the phrase "blue widgets" is searched this is firstly checked to their to see whether it matches any of their predefined "profitable" searches. If it does it uses an one algo if it does not it uses another (the old) algo. I have checked various searches and this appears to hold true but not all.
Example:
I DONT show up for my business name, which is completely strange, however I so show up for the first three words in my name, why? The last word.
Lets say I sell pretty blue widgets and didgets but primarily I sell widgets. My main keyword would be:
Pretty Blue Widgets
Since the update though, I show for only:
Pretty blue
Pretty blue didget
didgets in pretty blue
NONE of my terms show up for the word widget anywhere. My indexed site shows up for didgets but not for widgets, follow me?
Look outside the box on your sites, I think this is the reason everyone is having so much trouble with this. We are all either suffering saturation penalities on specific keywords or that specific word is encountering some kind of problem in the serps.
Let me mention that my site is STILL number 1 with my index pages for anything that has the word didget or pretty blue.
They are using the keyphrase in the title only once with a geographic component twice. Seems to really work well even though the landing page is the same for every subdomain.
Looks like using your keyword sparingly in the title, description, etc. but having a supporting word or phrase twice really works...
So somethings have changed, but its nice to have it back.
1) Google has increased broad matching more. If you search for "widgets" sites that only contain "widget" do much better. I think this is the single biggest loss of relevency.
2) As other people have pointed out something is definately up with keyword density. I am not sure if Google has downrated this factor or penalized it over some amount. Clearly, though, there seems to be some "sweet spot" where there is not too little nor too much kw density.
3) As people have stated around the dash (-) posts, having multiple word phrases on your page seems irrelevent unless someone explicitly searches for a phrase. There may be a sweet spot as with density, but I think keyword proximity and ordering is meaningless to the current SERPs.
4) If the points above don't come into play, PR actually seems to me to be kicking a**.
Inktomi optimization is accomplished with heavily loaded on-page factors while google optimization is done with more off-page factors.
Google is now dropping sites for keywords that match both heavy on-page and off-page optimization.
Maybe they're trying to force people to "choose sides".
looks like using sub domains is working for quite a few people. I'm seeing a single company dominate the to 15 or so using subdomains.
Yeah and the guy that built that site will be back here in two months time for update Georgina crying "argghh... Google has really messed up this time, my site is nowhere to be seen!".
TJ
Pretty - 50 - 12.08%
blue - 49 - 11.84%
widgets - 24 - 5.80%
didgets - 12 - 2.90%
widget - 9 - 2.17%
If you add the % of widgets and widget you come up with high saturation of that specific word (7.97%) What makes no sense is the words pretty and blue both have hugely high keyword saturation due to geographic area and they dont seem to be affected at all.
In regards to my competitors I think it is silly to start looking at them until the serps settle. Many of my serps are very different than last night. Half the battle is just finding the issue and then making progress on fixing it.
All they need to do is change the default setting of results returned per page to 500. Then, being behind 480 irrelevant results won't hurt so bad, as long as your still on the first page.;)
How else to explain this mystery which I mentioned here before:
Title of page: word1 word2 word3 word4
Result of search for word1 word2 word3: TOP RESULT
Result of search for word1 word2 word3 word4: NOWHERE TO BE SEEN IN FIRST 10 PAGES (and in page 10 none of those words are even mentioned in the title).
Obviously my page is getting a penalty because the title too closely matches the search phrase. How else is this explained?
Maybe you should try changing your title from "Keyword1 Keyword2" to "Company name - the best source for keyword1 keyword2" and you will do better in the SERPs?