Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Florida - Nov 2003 Google Update Part 2

         

GoogleGuy

4:50 pm on Nov 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Continued from part 1: [webmasterworld.com...]


I stopped by several times yesterday, but it seemed like people were into the analysis stage already. caveman, this update didn't add any penalties for hyphenated domains, so that's not a factor. Just a reminder that people with specific feedback (good or bad) can send it to webmaster [at] google.com with the keyword "floridaupdate" somewhere in the email. I've mentioned that a few times, but as more than one person has pointed out, it can take 2-3 hours to read the whole thread from beginning to end. :)

mayor

9:25 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Googlebot now deep crawling a couple new sites ... do I hear the fat lady singing?

Jessica

9:40 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



so, is the update over?
i still dont see my site when i serach for www.site.com/index.html

Dave_Hawley

9:49 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)



so, is the update over?

How long is a piece of string? Updates are perpetual.

Dave

sit2510

9:50 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi Everyone,

Googleguy - "I think most of the data for this iteration has been folded in now "

=====================================

Oops...! If that's the case, then this Florida Update is the *ADVANCE* version of Dominic by Google? Last time G had shown what they intend to head for in regards to the serp and new algo but had done it poorly - so this seems to be the enhancement of Dominic algo. The missing index page is one of its symptom and I'm quite worry that this round they may not reappear. In the future we have to stress much more on "organic links"!

sit2510

10:01 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member




>>> Most of these sites have links coming from thematically similar websites or pages. I mean, for an instance, the sites at top for hosting related keywords have links from hosting related sites or the links pages have the keywords (hosting etc.) in the title. Any thoughts?

==================================

It is unlikely to be the case, napoleon_bona_part_2...I believe many sites that suffer from missing index pages and got dumped got links only from thematically similar sites with related link text.

Jessica

10:10 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



How can Google leave "missing index pages" not fixed?
I don't think its possible.
I'm pretty sure they will fix it.

coosblues

10:15 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think googleguy is much like the bible, you must interpret to get the real facts, if you dont you arent really reading what he is saying.

And next are we going to believe that Google is God?

Bad things happen to good people and vice-versa, but to put GG in the same sentence with the bible is going a bit to far.

I believe, but in the One and only "G", and if you have to ask which "G" that is it may be time to rethink your life rather than your web sites.

icebane

10:19 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think, you need to preach somewhere else.

djgreg

10:22 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi guys,

I've been reading this thread since it came up, but I didn't thought there was much to say.
Now some of my observations:

I have about 30 domains in Google, all in other "keyword-areas", some on very competitve keywords some on niche-keywords.
And all in all I don't know what you all are complaining about. None of my sites has moved up or down. They all keep their good positions, except one site, which completely fell out. But this problem occured with other webmasters, too so I think it is due to some technical (spidering) problems.
Therefore I think everybody who made good, non-tricky, google-guideline seo should keep his position, or a competitor has made better seo and ranks above now.

What displeases me a bit are so-called "search-engine-sites/directories" which have created a doorwaypage for every keyword combination they can imagine. Those doorwaypages have usually paid links or affiliate links on them and rank pretty high for 2-3 keyword phrases.

I really can't see a quality - decrease in the SERPS for my keywords and the searches I usally do for private purposes.

greg

sit2510

10:24 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>> How can Google leave "missing index pages" not fixed?
I don't think its possible.
I'm pretty sure they will fix it.

=======================================

Jessica, I also hope so because I'm one of the victims, but what make me worry is that not all the index pages are missing! IMHO, G does not miss any index page this time, but it seems that G does *NOT* credit much enough link weight that they previous did, so the index pages got dumped and lose the positions. From my observation, it is not necessary to be the index page, but any other page that has inflated incoming links.

Jessica

10:29 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



but my index page didnt just droop - it has disappeared from the search.

i do a search for www.site.com/index.html and google is unable to find it

Miop

10:33 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My index page seems to be ok, but the sub index pages are not even up to date versions which were cached. My toolbar can't decide what pr my page has.
I'd guess it hasn't finished - I hope it hasn't finished.
If it has, I should say something is wrong - even 3rd level directory blog pages are showing higher than some of the big boys in my field.

gosman

10:36 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Backlinks keep appearing then disapperaing on www

My PR keeps increasing then decreasing

Anyone else noticing this.

I don't think it's over yet.

lbobke

10:44 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



gosman,

same here, PR comes and goes for my domains.

Laurenz

allanp73

10:49 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My index pages are finally back. The serps for many terms which I have historically ranked well are showing deceased ranking. Strangely sites with less pr, less relevant text, weaker anchor text backlinks and sites which are not even related to the search phrase are ranking better than my niche site.
I hope this is not the end of the process because it looks bad.

WebmasterFisherman

10:56 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)



I am seeing Hewlett Packard ranking high for a web development related term on -va.

Sure: they have PR10 and some mentioning of "company" and "development" in the body.

Looks like they are switching over to another business :)

[edited by: WebmasterFisherman at 10:59 am (utc) on Nov. 19, 2003]

my3cents

10:57 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Many of my internal pages seem to be comepletely gone too for their keywords. My index page is ranking for those keywords 5-20 spots below where the internal page used to rank. I am seeing some of my pages show up for the wrong search term, for what seems to be, because it has a link to the proper page in anchor text. (?)

My index page only lost a few spots for the main term (which accounts for about 50% of the market), it's been top 2-3 for about 5 months, top ten for a year) but I see that many of my largest competitors have vanished. I doubt they did anything close to being considered spam. In their places are a variety of pages related to the keyphrase, a link to an old report from the EPA, a DEEP amazon page and a couple of very poor single product/low PR 2-3 page websites.

My home page drops from 2 to 9 and my sales are up, because somewhow, at least for the last few days, google no longer finds some of my competitors from the top 10 worthy of a top 500 listing anymore?

I really doubt that those quality sites will not return. My index page vanished in Esmeralda for "weeks but not months" and I had similar problems last Sept./Oct. - I made no changes to my conservative approach and everything came back in, some better than before.

If all the data is "folded in" now, I would think we would start seeing it "unfold" soon and see what Florida has in store for the Holiday season. :)

my3cents

chompy

11:02 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



i just ran through the datacentres and here's my results for my site for a single keyword;

www-ex 234,000 results position =25 backlinks =6
www-kr 188,000 results position =25 backlinks =6
www-mc 183,000 " " =23 " =6
www.va 276,000 " " =25 " =5
www.dc 279,000 " " =25 " =6
www.fi 266,000 " " =25 " =6
www.ab 274,000 " " =25 " =6
www.in 283,000 " " =13 " =6
www.cw 281,000 " " =25 " =6
www.gv 187,000 " " =25 " =6

for a generic word such as 'news' this is the results from the DC's

www-ex 326,000,000 top3 cnn,bbc,abc backlinks top1 115,000
www-kr 252,000,000 top3 ---same--- " " 115,000
www-mc 240,000,000 top3 cnn,bbc,fox " " 114,000
www-va 372,000,000 top3 cnn,bbc,abc " " 110,000
for the remainin DCs the top3 remain the same and the backlinks remain the same the results total varies as follows

www-dc 378,000,000
www-fi 357,000,000
www-ab 370,000,000
www-in 368,000,000
www-cw 377,000,000
www-gv 253,000,000

a search against 'share buying' returned a similar range of results varying over the DC's the top 3 remained the same except for on DC's www-mc and www-in

from the above it seems to me that www-mc, www-va www-in are most in change in easy to see factors the others less noticably so. Can anything else be determined from looking at these datacentre results other than it is still in flux? And i'd like www-in to be the index! ;-)

chompy

11:08 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



and i forgot to add, www.google.com appears to be showing the www-dc datacentre results currently, going by the results for the terms i used in the above post.

harrisuk

11:24 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yep my PR is changing also. Going up and down. I started a new post on this in the Google Toolbar forum but they said it was not relevant and would be moved here once moderated.

They obviously havent bothered moving it, I thought it was worth discussing to be honest.....

steveb

11:40 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If you don't change your hosts file to the -va datacenter, updated PR will move in and out of your toolbar as the datacenters take their normal turns being the default one serving you. It's perfectly normal and essentially irrelevant. When the new PR moves to all the datacenters from -va then the toolbar display will be stable for those who leave it at the default.

What happens to be showing on www doesn't matter and will keep changing till all the datacenters sync, so you really should just ignore all that.

Napoleon

11:44 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)



>> I am seeing Hewlett Packard ranking high for a web development related term.... Sure: they have PR10 and some mentioning of "company" and "development" in the body <<

Hehehe... yes, that sort of scenario is WIDESPREAD in this index.

When you change the algo to crank out index pages via an anchor-text and on-page SEO formula, the result is:

a) Focused niche sites drop out
b) The quality of the SERPS is drastically reduced as a result
c) And of course, many small guys suffer badly

Unless they are totally stupid, or fixated with one single set of test data, Google are certainly aware of this. They must, therefore, have a different agenda to the one most people presume.

Ironically, the winners, apart from those big (HP type) sites with deep pockets, could ultimately include Inktomi. For the first time ever, their index now compares favourably to Google for my testbed of 20 searches.

netnerd

11:50 am on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I agree- intomi have better results for me. I even hate to say this, but even msn is proving a more facourable option on some searches for my industry!

tigger

12:00 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



never though I'd say it but Ink is looking better, hang your head in shame G

merlin30

12:01 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



So does AV and ATW!

wellzy

12:02 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



There is no way these can be view as more relevant search results. For some keyword phrases where I was #1, I am no longer on the map. The first two sites are not even relevant. The next few are Directory listings that are relevant, but do not contain the search phrase anywhere. A lot of hard word just went down the drain. I cannot believe these are the results they want. Guess it's heavier on the PPC for me.

subway

12:07 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Google, if you are still reading ... these are the most ridiculous results you have ever produced. You must have become the laughing stock of the search engine industry over the last 96 hours.

I see Spam everywhere and will not be emailing you with examples as it's not my job to help you produce relevant results - it's yours. I think expecting all the webmasterworld "Google algo change guinea pigs" here to report Spam is adding insult to injury.

Sorry.
V Disgruntled Customer

SlyOldDog

12:09 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Come on guys and girls.

Take it on the chin. You got caught with your pants down. So did we. Forget about it. You have a month to clean up.

stevew

12:11 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"You have a month to clean up."

Really?

It would be nice to know just what, exactly.

textex

12:16 pm on Nov 19, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google SEO and the proper way to link exchange seems like a riddle!

What sort of changes do we do?

We make these irregular SEO changes, then Yahoo! switches to INK and we all get hammered in INK!

This 933 message thread spans 32 pages: 933