false start...i saw it for a minute...now back to the same 642K
griego
3:41 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
yep it started already!
dvduval
3:41 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
but still showing some sites with no changes...anyone else?
Alec Doggone
3:41 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
Bah! Nothing in the UK yet :(
crobb305
3:42 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
Nothing in Texas yet.
korkus2000
3:42 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
Nothing here in Atlanta
confiden
3:42 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
>Lazerzubb, I BEAT YOU! Do I get some sort of prize for this? ;)
Don't even think about it, I WAS FIRST NOTICING SOMETHING WAS GOING THERE BOY!
NickCoons
3:42 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
Not seeing it in Phoenix.
atadams
3:42 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
It's definatly started.
And I beat you, rfgdxm1!
AcesHigh
3:43 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
Not as many updated links as I wanted but STILL a considerable more listed.
gopi
3:43 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
I see nothing ...
steveb
3:43 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
Nothing in LA.
brotherhood of LAN
3:43 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
Nothing here in Galashiels...erm...Scotland.
the active list looks funny. "its its....the..."
mrkarron
3:43 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
I think it was a tease.. back to 642K
Rugles
3:44 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
I do not see it.
Did they switch back?
rfgdxm1
3:44 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
I am seeing www2 and www3 have reverted back for the moment. However, multiple people posted here they saw the same with the Yahoo backlinks change. Thus this proves it wasn't just a drug induced hallucination of mine. ;)
griego
3:44 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
just the first steps only
bawhitney
3:44 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
Definite tease
Guess he tripped over the cord and unplugged the dance machine.
diddlydazz
3:44 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
googleguy are you messing us about ;o)
serps are intermittent here in portugal.
Dazz
PFOnline
3:45 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
yahoo backlinks:
www = 642,000 www2 = 642,000 www3 = 642,000
but i believe u that it flickered there for a sec.
NickCoons
3:45 am on Mar 7, 2003 (gmt 0)
rfgdxm1,
<Thus this proves it wasn't just a drug induced hallucination of mine. ;)>
Would you have reason to believe it was drug-induced? :-)