Forum Moderators: open
But some other large company could be talking to yahoo. Small extensions in contracts are quit fishy.
[edited by: korkus2000 at 1:20 pm (utc) on July 18, 2002]
To put it nicely, with Microsoft already tangling with issues over "disproportionate market share" in one area already, yet unresolved as korkus2000 pointed out, I think it would be unlikely that they'd do something that would be instantly looked at the same way.
Yahoo is still a large source of search engine traffic. = Good for webmasters
Yahoo is still a good place to find products and services, either in their directory or within their search results powered by Google. = Good for the consumer
Here is just a few good reasons MSFT would want them.
- Yahoo's Maps
- Yahoo's HotJobs
- Yahoo IM
- Yahoo Games
- Yahoo Directory
- Yahoo slice of Google
- Yahoo's Millions of customers
They just haven't demonstrated their trustworthiness. Being sued by what 13 states and found guilty doesn't build consumer confidence IMO. I am not convinced they have the user's best interests in mind. And their ability to reach and influence that many more people on the web through Yahoo just gets scarier.
Evil empire :)
I don't see it happening. I just don't see it.
G.
Trust and Microsoft don't belong in the same sentence. They have the power to dictate crazy licencing terms to their corporate clients and continually demand dramatically increasing fees. The cost of switching is immense as is the cost of doing business with Microsoft.
For them to start applying their methodology and business practices to accessing info on the web would not be good.
One thing i would absolutely disagree on. Given its size and influence, MS's innovation is abysmal. They have grown by acquisition and copying other's ideas rather than any down home innovation. They have indeed discouraged innovation outside, as most developers know that if you come up with a real innovation, MS would copy it. True innovators hardly ever make money anyway.
As a marketing company i would give them A++. For busines strategy I would give them a B+. For innovation I would give them an F. For quality control i would give them a D.
Gate's spin that MS is innovative and has helped the world become techno is just that.. absolute spin. It is deft marketing that made MS great.
That my objective take, and I am no anti-MS zealot and use several of their products.