Forum Moderators: open
Is this some sort of penalty? The thing is if it was it wouldn't show in the serps, but with Yahoo displaying it like that no one is clicking thorugh! Any ideas as to why Yahoo wouldn't display / index the homepage properly?
the site isn't new, it's been around for 18 months and this has gone on for some time.
It is not in dmoz, and not in the yahoo directory.
That's the strange thing. The title in Yahoo bears no resemblance on the website title, and there is no description showing, so obviosuly no one is going to click through.
This is only affecting the homepage too. The rest of the site is OK.
For sake of example, if the title of a homepage is
Zample Goo! - Great Widgets for a New Age
the new SRP would list it as
sample go
In this case the trademark is Zample Goo!, and it is "misspelled" intentionally. But Yahoo! is deciding it has the authority to arbitrarily rename contrived words (like trademarks) using its new algorithms apparently. And the end-results are quite disconcerting. The replaced terms are derived out of thin-air and don't even coincide with the page's meta keywords (if any) nor the actual page content.
I was just looking up a prominent (Google PR6) government page awhile ago, and the impact is clearly evident even with high-ranking sites. What can be done to avoid this?
TIA,
--Randall
[edited by: martinibuster at 2:50 am (utc) on Jan. 15, 2007]
[edit reason] Spliced. [/edit]
I tried another search, and the same thing happened to a forum site listed in the tenth position. Yahoo replaced existing site title with a new title in minor case.
In both of the above cases, the keyword phrase exists within the title of the site. But it appears Yahoo is stripping them of branding or other phrases, then minor-casing them.
I saw another instance where Yahoo kept the existing title, but displayed it in lower case.
What criteria do you think they're using to choose which sites they do this to?
[edited by: martinibuster at 3:10 am (utc) on Jan. 15, 2007]
I am confused if this is a permanent change and what benefit it is supposed to provide to end-users. It seems that diluting the marketing value of proprietary marks by replacing them with approximate dictionary terms and/or automatically rendering proprietary markes in all lowercase is both unprofessional and of no benefit to either business-owners nor consumers. It's particularly of concern, however, since even official government documents, notices, and reports are starting to be renamed with these new generic titles, which makes the SERPs increasingly misleading.
TIA,
--Randall
I checked terms that I do not have sites in and seen it in others sites as well.
Anyone else seeing this?
[edited by: martinibuster at 3:43 am (utc) on Jan. 15, 2007]
[edit reason] Spliced [/edit]
This is a bug that was shown at Webmaster World in November that the panel incorrectly stated that the site in question was cloaking. I spoke to a Yahoo engineer and they stated it was a bug and they were trying to determine what was causing it. Looks like they haven't figured it out yet!
...instead are using the primary keyword in lower case.
Just saw this on a client page that primarily targets two phrases.... "keyword1 widgets" and "keyword2 widgets."
What's fascinating is that the returned "title" in fact does identify these two primary target phrases of the page, even though I only searched for one of them.
When I search for [keyword1 widgets], the displayed title is...
keyword1 and keyword2 widgets
When I search for [keyword2 widgets], the title display is...
keyword1 and keyword2 widgets
I should mention that the phrase "keyword1 and keyword2" never appears in the title. It does appear once on the page, but that's not generally how the terms are used.
I should mention that the phrase "keyword1 and keyword2" never appears in the title. It does appear once on the page, but that's not generally how the terms are used.
For pages that you do want to be indexed, if Yahoo cannot find a title on the page, they also sometimes use anchor text from one of the incoming links. Make sure that there isn't an HTML error in the code around your title tag.
I was thinking that this may be caused by a spammer scraper site linking to the site in question as well. Here is a hypothetical example.
1. Spammer's scraping software searched for "sample go"
2. Yahoo returned a few results, and one of them was "Zample Goo" (automagically corrected term)
3. Spammer's software created a page linking the original search term/keyword to the page found in SERPs
4. Yahoo indexed the naughty scraper page and cosidered it somewhat authority (i.e. high value)
5. User searches for terms "Zample Goo"
6. Yahoo glitched somewhere along the way while returning the SERPs and couldn't find title/description snippet for one of the results (maybe a database is corrupted, or a replicated server down, or whatever of the billion computer problems it could be)
7. Yahoo "creates" a new title based on the incoming link's anchor text
I know it's far fetched, but I just wanted to play the guessing game too :)
7. Yahoo "creates" a new title based on the incoming link's anchor text
I noticed this behavior in Yahoo for one of my pages, and my impression then was that it was anchor text appearing. I guessed it was taking the anchor from a site it considered more authoritative than mine.
The robots file on the site just invites everyone in, and I'm pretty sure the page was valid HTML. I'll check into it if I can find it again.
Yahoo Penalty - If you have a penalty assigned to your site, Yahoo may not show the "cache" link of your pages, and the titles may appear in lower case. Both are a sign that you may want to consider evaluating your site for any problems.
Reference:
[sockmoney.com...]
I don't know about "more authorative", I just saw it used the anchor text when it was something other than click here or the domain name itself, and fitted the theme of the page being linked to.
I don't poke around in Yahoo SERPs all that much.
I do find they takes years to obey robots directives, and years to reindex some content after it has changed.
But there are other links from Wiki (and some other big sites) to pages of mine, where the title of the page is not replaced by the Wiki anchor text. (These two links have been on Wiki for at least 9 months.)
One of the pages where the titles has been replaced has no links from other than the Wiki, but there are several other links to the other page. (The pages that did not change might have more links than these.)
If somebody told me that Yahoo simply trusts the anchor text of a big "authority" site like Wiki better than the particular page title, I'd probably believe that. I just hope they fix the capitalization some time. Even Title Case Would Help.
Also, I saw another page in the serps (not from my site) that had similar lower-case titles, but which did not have a link from Wiki. The title Yahoo used made a lot of sense, and the title on the page was too short and vague. Yahoo said there was 1 link to the page (from a PR1, low-traffic site) and the anchor text was a (case insenstive) match to the title in Yahoo's SERP.
I remember at the site review panel at Pubcon last fall (with Tim Mayer, Danny Sullivan, Matt Cutts, etc) that one of the sites reviewed had its title in the Yahoo serps in all lower case, and it wasn't that way in the source of the page. At the time, no one could figure out why. Perhaps this was an early instance of that problem.
I was there for this session as well. Tim Mayer finally came out and said it was most likely due to a penalty of some sort.
[edited by: martinibuster at 7:10 am (utc) on Jan. 17, 2007]
[edit reason] Corrected spelling per member request. [/edit]