Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Directory Postion

What is better high or low?

         

otnot

12:53 am on Mar 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Back in 95 when my site was listed it was listed in one of the upper categories that now doesn't fully relate to my business. Should I request them to change it? I also wonder what effect this will have when Inktomi results begin to be used?

brotherhood of LAN

12:57 am on Mar 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I would guess at - the majority saying that lower is better, to the one that's most on topic.

Saying this, I assume you are wondering if a higher PR more generic category listing will benefit you more than being listed deeper in a more on-topic category.

For the most benefit, pagerank, visits, conversions and in general, I'd vote for the most on-topic category, but it's a bit of a general question.

//added
if its a commercial site then I guess the chances of you getting the move could be a bit better/expensive?

otnot

1:11 am on Mar 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



It's kind of funny that when I drill down through the directory it is topic specific but when I do a web search it only shows two levels? Yes it is a commercial site. So you think I would have to pay the $300 to get it relisted?

brotherhood of LAN

1:22 am on Mar 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>So you think I would have to pay the $300 to get it relisted?

Are they going to do it for free...or how long will it take to do a freebie? Just some food for thought, to be honest I don't know.

Can't see myself using the category matches as a tool when it only goes two levels deep. When do people ever want to click more than once in a websearch to get what theyre looking for....just an IMO.

More on topic just seems more like more long term benefit in any event.

otnot

1:38 am on Mar 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I thought since it was a grandfathered site they would change it for free. Thanks for the feed back.

SkinnyJoe

2:35 am on Mar 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



otnot,

What are the PR values and approximate number of other listings for the category you are listed in now and also for the category you are looking at moving to?

otnot

6:33 am on Mar 26, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi SkinnyJoe:
There are 267 in the category I'm in and the one I want to move to has 28. I don't know what the Pr value is for the other sites but mine is 5.

2_much

3:40 am on Mar 27, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hi otnot,

I tend to always go for the higher category, even if it has more sites. I tend to find that the higher up categories get more traffic and more exposure in the SERP's - often they get returned as relevant cat's for a keyword search.

Since it's grandfathered, I wouldn't try to do anything to it. They might charge you for the changes.

Canton

3:48 am on Mar 27, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



otnot...

We've had experience changing Yahoo! listings (both grandfathered and paid directory listings)...Requesting a change to a grandfathered listing, in the one experience we had, DID NOT result in Yahoo! charging us. However, it's difficult to say how long the change will take, and it most likely will be necessary to make more than one request (make sure to note the date of your first request, because Yahoo! editors seem not to respond to second requests unless you've offered this information).

~Canton

otnot

4:23 am on Mar 27, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I recently requested a URL change and it only took them 2 days to complete but for some reason they left out the new description? My fist instinct is to give more weight to a site that is listed higher in the category the same as higher in SERPS.