Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Why not using WYSIWYG editors?

WYSIWYG editors

         

nirfun

7:01 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi,
I was wondering why this website and many more don't use a WYSIWYG editor.

What are the disadvantages in such editor?

It looks better and it's easier to use.

Why NOT using WYSIWYG editors?

Thanks.

Samizdata

7:18 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



What are the disadvantages in such editor?

What you see is not necessarily what you get.

And automated markup is always likely to be bloated.

It looks better and it's easier to use

"Looks better" is untrue, but if you find it easier to use then keep using it.

Control freaks might prefer a text editor.

...

lavazza

7:28 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I wonder if the OP is wondering about posting on this forum?

If so, I concur... the absence of a WYSIWYG (as per vBulletin, phpBB, etc) seems rather bizarre

nealrodriguez

7:38 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



it would be great to have some buttons to automatically tag some words with italics and quotes;

tedster

9:54 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



buttons

They are available, just not on a "Quick Reply" box. Try the "reply to this topic" text link [bottom, right] or the graphic "Post Reply" link [top, right]. The buttons are just above the input box.

lavazza

10:00 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The buttons are just above the input box
Yeah? Where? I must be blind and/or stoopid

tedster

10:06 pm on Mar 19, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Whoops, sorry. I forgot that I'm working on a beta interface. It's a feature that is under development, I guess. No promises, though, as with any beta feature. I should have thought longer before I posted.

kaled

3:59 am on Mar 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I experimented a little with a WYSIWYG editor over Christmas. It's not too tricky to create one but there are differences between Mozilla and Internet Explorer.

The question is how far do you take it? The current system is simple (and therefore reliable) but it is also powerful. To include all the features that exist currently would take some effort to get right. However, I don't think code-bloat is an issue.

I seem to recall the biggest problem was integrating CSS into the output code. I decided that this was just too darn tricky to do in javascript but I would be very interested to know if this problem is solved.

Kaled.

lavazza

4:20 am on Mar 20, 2009 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I seem to recall the biggest problem was integrating CSS into the output code.
For a few tags, no CSS is required; e.g. strong, em, sup

However, I think that it's stuff like (esp vBulletin's) multi-quote, ULs, OLs, automated-URLs, CODE, PRE, HTML, PHP, etc that would drag WebmasterWorld screaming into the 21st C