Forum Moderators: open
What are the disadvantages in such editor?
What you see is not necessarily what you get.
And automated markup is always likely to be bloated.
It looks better and it's easier to use
"Looks better" is untrue, but if you find it easier to use then keep using it.
Control freaks might prefer a text editor.
...
The question is how far do you take it? The current system is simple (and therefore reliable) but it is also powerful. To include all the features that exist currently would take some effort to get right. However, I don't think code-bloat is an issue.
I seem to recall the biggest problem was integrating CSS into the output code. I decided that this was just too darn tricky to do in javascript but I would be very interested to know if this problem is solved.
Kaled.
I seem to recall the biggest problem was integrating CSS into the output code.For a few tags, no CSS is required; e.g. strong, em, sup
However, I think that it's stuff like (esp vBulletin's) multi-quote, ULs, OLs, automated-URLs, CODE, PRE, HTML, PHP, etc that would drag WebmasterWorld screaming into the 21st C