Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Florida - Nov 2003 Google Update Part 2

         

GoogleGuy

4:50 pm on Nov 17, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Continued from part 1: [webmasterworld.com...]


I stopped by several times yesterday, but it seemed like people were into the analysis stage already. caveman, this update didn't add any penalties for hyphenated domains, so that's not a factor. Just a reminder that people with specific feedback (good or bad) can send it to webmaster [at] google.com with the keyword "floridaupdate" somewhere in the email. I've mentioned that a few times, but as more than one person has pointed out, it can take 2-3 hours to read the whole thread from beginning to end. :)

killipso

7:12 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Anyone notice when you click on "similar pages"
theres nothing there?
I did it to bunch of sites including my own.
Is it possible the rank for amount of pages is being discontinued right now?
Because that would explain y 1 page sites are up there along with all the message board spam I am seeing.

rfgdxm1

7:14 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>That quote is B**@~@, keyword-keyword.com are common place domains for most companies now, its the keyword-keyword-keyword-keyword.com that are spam.

>get your'e facts right!

Good point. Single hyphen domains are ALL kinds of common in non-spam sites. It is only when the # of keywords get large is it usually spam.

The_Hitcher

7:16 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm inclined to avoid this particular thread if only for the fact it was a common topic of conversation whenever Google did a major update. However, if these results stick, Google could well end up with the irrelevant results it strives so hard to avoid. One can only hope that they do at least take all these posts into account and be really careful what they do. For the time being I'll sit and watch, but I have to agree, at the moment the results are all over the place and its hard work to find what you're actually looking for. Sites do go up and down and algos do change but if the results are no good for users either, then there really is a problem.

deanril

7:20 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Exactly The_Hitcher

They have 10+ datacenters they just ____ themseleves by doing this public.

The_Hitcher

7:23 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Never mind - if it comes to it, theres always two tin cans and a piece of string. Well it worked for me, back in 1972........

europeforvisitors

7:25 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)



Like a zillion others, I use Google a lot to find information. Anything : technical problem, piece of news, finding suppliers ...
I have now stopped because the results are cr*p.

I'm not seeing that at all. For everything I've checked, results are at least as good as they were before the update, and they may be better. And I'm not just talking about categories where my pages rank #1. :-)

gosman

7:32 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Is their anybody here who was running Adsense had their site dropped?

rfgdxm1

7:33 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I'm not seeing that at all. For everything I've checked, results are at least as good as they were before the update, and they may be better. And I'm not just talking about categories where my pages rank #1. :-)

Exactly europeforvisitors. I've checked numerous info-type SERPs where my sites have never ranked. All of them looked good to me. Leading me to suspect that where there are problems, they must be in certain heavily spammed areas.

WebmasterFisherman

7:41 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)



I get the old cache of my site when doing allinanchor: search. My new cache dates back to the 16th.
Does that mean anchor hasn't been factored in for pages updated after some date (<=16th) yet?
They claim they use some *stable data set* (i.e. older data set) to test the algo first only then adding newer content.
Maybe this is the clue?

carlr

7:41 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This is what i see too.

I have a look at some adult categories and they almost look like they are non-adult... a mix of un-optimized websites, directory categories, old news pages about a sex-related subject etc.

My guess is that adult and other "questionable" categories were intentionally harmed. Looks better before doing an IPO.

Chndru

7:45 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I see the quality of lot of the serps are pretty right-on-the-spot and very clean. Some are bit whacky, but, i could care less, since the other sites gives the same info that the previous top sites used to give.

rfgdxm1

7:45 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>I have a look at some adult categories and they almost look like they are non-adult... a mix of un-optimized websites, directory categories, old news pages about a sex-related subject etc.

>My guess is that adult and other "questionable" categories were intentionally harmed. Looks better before doing an IPO.

Or, someone at Google was tweaking the spam filters. The amount of spam in adult categories tends to be huge.

johnnydequino

7:48 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Here is a thought - I have updated news links and items and about 15 quality outbound links on my home page. Maybe with all these outbound links it thinks my home page is spam?

I am going to up my adwords spending again to get our listings back on track with the free search...!

ronin

7:48 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



I have it.
It's all a scheme to inspire investor confidence.

Google is aiming to make its results not so entirely irrelevant that it appears definitely broken, but off-target enough that the public begins to lose faith and start turning to other methods or start talking about 'the end of Google'.

Just before Christmas is a good time to do this, because, given the season, I imagine search engine queries rocket.

Then, 6 weeks before the IPO, Google fire all up the engines and slam the switches back on.

BOOM

The February 2004 newspapers start raving: Google is BACK and it's the best search engine ever! We might not have noticed just _how good_ it was if it had just trundled on as normal, but after two months of wrestling with slightly off-topic SERPS, having perfectly relevant ones now seems like a dream!

Investor confidence soars... Google sells for an even higher price than could have been dreamt of in late 2003!

amazed

7:48 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



yep fisherman that is what I see too -in seems to have old page rank but fresher pages.

mikeD

7:48 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm not seeing that at all. For everything I've checked, results are at least as good as they were before the update, and they may be better. And I'm not just talking about categories where my pages rank #1. :-)

Totally agree with this poster, the results look just as good as normal. I took a bad hit when the dom update happened but you didnt hear me moaning. It all seems like sour grapes to me.

All the people who are saying silly things such as

The public are noticing as well. I was at a customers site today. They have a standard desktop with their homepage set to Google as they are a research company. I was asked by one of the directors to change the home page to another search engine as they were finding the results had deteriorated

just look a joke really. Are they hoping it will influenece GG or something?

I think it's great big merchants like Amazon have taken a hit.

tomasz

7:50 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I see updated links on www

dazzlindonna

7:50 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



one thing's for sure...its not just *questionable* topics that applies to this. my subject area is not a spammy area (i dont think i've ever seen a spammy site in the results), it is not adult-related, or pharmacy-related, or any of the types of areas that google might want to penalize. it is straight-on technology-related that generally only includes legitimate ordinary businesses that any other business would want or need. while it does contain mostly commercial sites, my particular site is mostly informational, though it does have a commercial aspect to it.

essentially, i can't say any of the sites that are there now, or were there before, didn't deserve to be there. they all have their merits. what i am sure of is that there is a problem with index pages - the rest of my site ranks exactly where it did before, and all of my non-main phrases rank the same as well - even for the index page. so it doesn't look like a penalty - it looks like either an "oopsie" or not all the algos being factored in yet. i don't buy the penalty theories at all.

notawebmaster

7:50 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This has been one of the best updates for our site in many many months. The site that has had a death grip on the #1 serp via less than "white hat" methods has been dumped along with others of similar design schemes. We moved up to #7 on our main three word phrase. No tricks. I'm pleased for the time being. The Serps for all of our KW phrases come back very relevant (we’ve bounced around a little, but not much) so I’m having a hard time seeing why some are having fits over this update.

Sunset_Jim

7:52 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



gosman

>>Is their anybody here who was running Adsense had their site dropped?

I have been running AdSense on my site that has disappeared from the top 100 SERPS in all but data center 8. I haven't looked deeper than the top 100 pages. I have been tracking my AdSense results. My page impressions and click throughs have been cut in half. This means Google is losing money on my site.

carlr

7:52 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hard to say. I run adult sites and do not spam and always had some success this way. That's why i think they hammered adult sites.

stuntdubl

7:58 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I bet Google employees come here on occasion when they are stressed for a good laugh from reading all the conspiracy theories and comments from spastic webmasters.

claus

7:59 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>> technical queries
uhm, perhaps technical is more than one thing... a typical problem is: to find a way to make a vertical scrollbar in a <div> using CSS (vertical only, not the "overflow:auto"). Imho, that's pretty technical, but i just can't seem to get anything but useless maillists or forums no matter how i phrase the query. Others involve, eg. how to make the Apahe webserver do this or that.

It's not a "Florida" problem though, it arrived with deepfreshbot.

/claus

mfishy

7:59 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



<<Leading me to suspect that where there are problems, they must be in certain heavily spammed areas. >>

Yah, like every single commercial area on the web.

crankin

8:00 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



gosman

>Is their anybody here who was running Adsense had their site dropped?

Yep. My AdSense spots are running, but my SERP position is in the toilet. And like the other fella that responded, my clickthroughs have dropped. Folks seem more inclined to click on through if they see not just your ad, but your site show up as a top result.

Hope this sorts itself out soon.

sd2001

8:01 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)



I have a question:

When we lost our DMOZ listing, we lost the Google Directory as well.

DMOZ is now restored, but not Google Directory.

BUT we had a link from directory.google.com/*/*/ today, How?

jtoddv

8:05 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I agree with rfgdxm1, it is not over.

astounded

8:11 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Mine is an informational site. A few hundred pages of info and photos. It's NOT an adult site. No phony baloney external links coming in. Practically no outgoing links. And I hadn't been doing anything I thought was even close to spamming. But the pages that were hit hard were those with the keyword in the:

Title: Keyword1 Keyword2
H1 tag: Keyword1 Keyword2
directory: keyword/keyword.html
file name: keyword-keyword.html
And with links throughout the site going to those page, by keyword1-keyword2. Not just the index.html page was hit, but any of the other main pages with this type of internal naming and linking structure.

I thought this was the logical way to do a site. Apparently not. I'll wait for a few weeks to see what happens. But it seems rather ridiculous to me to have to go and make the site less relevant to the main keywords in order to not trip some Google filter.

I don't know of anything else to do. It's a clean site.

naturalinstinct

8:19 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



mikeD said:

Totally agree with this poster, the results look just as good as normal. I took a bad hit when the dom update happened but you didnt hear me moaning. It all seems like sour grapes to me.

I say:

he really needs to search on a few more searches and see what's really going on. I used altavista for the first time in about a year today because I simply couldn't find what i wanted on google. I was looking for a demo of a piece of software to open a file a client sent me. #1 was a hack/crack site #2 was a university site with one passing reference to it, #3 a gaming site mentioning the keyword in a different context and so on and so on. It was nice to see how altavista has changed since I last used it actually, and i found what i wanted.

It's not sour grapes and it's not that I think anyone from google will take any notice, i'm just saying what i see and i'd hate to see google go down the pan because i use it about 50 times a day.

Hunter

8:19 pm on Nov 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If you want to see a radical serp checkout the #1 ranking site for a search on: stock trading

Overture numbers for the term are huge, but the site is simply a parked domain.

265 links in FAST, but only 25 total links showing in Google.

This 933 message thread spans 32 pages: 933