Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

New Googlebot request

With keywords

         

Newman

1:57 pm on Jul 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have today in log file Googlebot request:

64.68.82.30 - - [16/Jul/2003:07:12:34 -0500] "GET /+keyword1%20keyword2 HTTP/1.0" 302 298 "-" "Googlebot/2.1 (+http://www.googlebot.com/bot.html)"

What is that? Something new?

bolitto

2:28 pm on Jul 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>What is that? Something new?

Yeah, a syntax error on some link on your site ;)

web_young

2:56 pm on Jul 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm having the same issue. In the log file it looks like this: pagename.htm%3Fsource%3Dgoogle

I think Google is spidering our adwords and not replacing the %3F with a? and %3D with an =. The %20 means there's a space in a URL. It could be a broken link to your site that Google is trying to access. Just make sure you have a custom missing.html page on your site and it should be ok.

g1smd

9:11 pm on Jul 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



If you are lucky, a search for that /+keyword1%20keyword2 might just turn up the page it is on, if it has been like that a while.

I have a friend who was getting a lot of requests for a page called /contact.htm%20 which always failed. Using google to search for domain.com/contact.htm%20 quickly located the offending page and site. It was simply someone with a dodgy cut and paste when they made the links on their page.

They had a: <a href="http:www.domain.com/contact.htm ">
instead of: <a href="http:www.domain.com/contact.htm">

A short email to the site owner resulted in the link being fixed in a few days.

thewebboy

5:05 am on Jul 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I had something similar too, Googlebot requested /26kw%3Dweb+hosting&cs%3DBG9Lme

I think a site linking to mine made a mistake and google happened to follow that link.

Powdork

5:59 am on Jul 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



What's up with the 302 redirect instead of a 404?