Forum Moderators: open
Logic would say, they build the index at one data center, and then distribute it over the rest...and, since they spider what, 50-100 million urls a day with the 'fresh indexing' in place, that would be a pretty decent percentage of the db that would fluctuate, at any given time.
Hope that helps. :)
I use <snip> to check the datacenters.
When I search for my keywords, I find my site on varying positions on the first three pages. My site has nice positions in -ex and -sj. But when I search from www.google.com the results seem the come more from other datacenters than these.
I thought that at some point during the update, the results from these datacenters would be similar. But now with this 'continuous update'..... I don't know what is going on.
[edited by: Marcia at 11:51 pm (utc) on June 27, 2003]
[edit reason] No tools URLs per forum charter, please. [/edit]
Recently I've been getting totally different results for some searches from day to day, so that searching the same kw's the site I happily used yesterday is today nowhere to be found! This is really obnoxious -- are you listening GG?
This had better not turn into default behavior -- I'll have to start using one of my old freehost accounts as a bookmark file again. This is not my idea of convenience.
(my user POV says:)
-change no more than weekly
-move results up and down gradually
(my webmaster POV says:)
-all this tumult is great for me, because I get more variety in visitors
I'm not saying my webmaster half (heh heh) is my evil half or anything like that. But Google needs to have both happy users and happy webmasters and as a user, I'm started to get irritated . . .
They are not exactly the same, and haven't been for weeks.
I agree.
This Update is definitely different. Previously one data centre showed results and the changes would stay on that data centre. This time I see results on one data centre (completely different from others) and that result is seen in the other data centre seconds later. Hence results stabilize in proportions and not data centre specific.
Maybe I didn't get the concept of these data-centres but I think they are doing load balancing internally for the total no of servers they have :(