Forum Moderators: open
However, I launched a new site at the tail end of 2002 which was no different fundamentally to anything else I had done before, or since and it was given a PR2 back in the January update. It had no backlinks then, fair enough, quite typical...
Next update comes along, Backlinks at 0, still PR2. Okay, third time lucky...
Dominic update, lots of strangeness across my whole network, backlinks lost all over the place, site in question still no backlinks, not unexpected due to wierdness.
Esmeralda update comes along and all the backlinks I worked hard to get 6 months ago are finally found, including DMOZ, Google Dir, Lycos Dir and a whole host of other relevant ones (with good PR's) totalling 30+ links. Hooray I think... The result... the PR is still at 2!
The thing that makes this irritating is that some of my later sites that are in the same industry "vaguely" and link to it are getting ranked higher because its main keyword is mentioned in its link!
What I ask is... eternal PR2 is a bit of a strange one that I haven't seen before, is it likely that the site has been penalised in some way? If so, how do I find out?
Has anyone else experienced this "low PR for ages, despite backlinks" behaviour? What happened long term?
Cheers in advance if you can shed any light.
D
There has also been some talk that we should not pay much attention to the PR in the toolbar.
The real question is, how well do you rank on your favorite keywords?
If you have a penalty, your pages will probably be very low in the SERP's.
I also try to get values from the directory listings wherever possible as I consider these to be more accurate (is this true or false?)... same result.
> The real question is, how well do you rank on your favorite keywords?
Not well at all. As I said in my initial post, newer sites of mine that are much less relevant rank higher even for keyword-in-domain specific searches! odd indeed.
> If you have a penalty, your pages will probably be very low in the SERP's.
I'd say top 50's, so more of a "slapped wrist" rather than a penalty!
I'll conclude that "wait it out" is the best advice (as usual with google)!
The toolbar is Google's experiment in group psychology, and WebmasterWorld is the lab. I guess that would make us rats? :)
LOL :-)
[edit reason: misspelling of 'Google']
[edited by: requiem at 3:20 pm (utc) on June 23, 2003]
Brett, it would be wonderfull if your ever so simple assessment actually still held true. Unfortunately when a sight has 0% Pagerank calculation, and pagerank is a multiplier of the content, your page simply won't rank. These sights don't come up anywhere in the top 100, they stay at the bottom of the bucket because google has NOT calculated their pagerank.
i think that i have to take a ww break. reading all of the hysteria drives me crazy.
I have a site that has one PR4 link (from the site detailed below) and about 75 outbound links and was surprised to see that it jumped to a PR 3.
My other site that is in Yahoo and DMOZ has about 30 outbound links and 80 plus incoming links and is stuck on a PR 4. Of the 80 incoming links about 70 have been added since the site hit Google at PR 4.
Serp results are the same or a bit worse on both sites. However, I am cleaning up on Alltheweb serps on my second site as I seem to be given full credit for my link ratio. Unfortunately I get about one hit per month from Alltheweb.
I can't make any sense of how PR is calculated anymore. It seems only three or four strong incoming links are all you need and additional links have diminishing returns.
Next site I cut some deals for incoming links with two or three PR 6/7 sites and quit wasting time chasing down incoming links. More links are no longer merrier.