Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Our is in website penalty?

Fraustrating it is clearly, we hope anybody can shed us a light.

         

junobieta

10:20 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Greetings and Salutations Everyone!

We have been developing a website and we have been spending over $50,000 and close to $100,000 for our dynamic website.

Our website is pretty expensive, to increase our page ranks, some SEO have submitted our site to FFA pages WHICH MOST OF THEM SAY IT IS UNAVOIDABLE GOOGLE'S PENALTY VERSUS TRAFFIC.

Google has been indexing our first page, which is OK, at the moment and for now we are happy rather than being removed from GOOGLE. we even had our search engine optimized for google.

We would like to know HOW WE THE INVESTORS OF EXPENSIVE WEBSITES TO AVOID PENALTY WHEN WE ARE SPENDING LIKE HELL JUST TO BE POPULAR, Then being removed for unfair reasons.

We would like to know how to be removed from PENALTY.

Our site consist of more than 650 Dynamic pages,and we have partners with more than 10 SEO. Yes we have a global mall, auctions, travel agencies, manpower agencies and community. and all our pages are ASP Based.

Google please assist us, What is your remedy? should we ban our reciprocal links just not to be penalized?

To other large dynamic websites who encountered this problem, do you share the same problem?

WHAT ARE YOUR GUIDELINES REGARDING THE PENALTY? AND HOW DO WE REMOVE IT?

[edited by: heini at 10:28 pm (utc) on June 9, 2003]
[edit reason] please don't use urls and site specifics/ thanks and welcome [/edit]

junobieta

10:27 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



To add,

We are an ASP and ISP, please can someone shed a light to us, I want to hear your official recommendations and not excuses from my adminto get another SEO.

Thank You

hutcheson

11:22 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>We would like to know HOW WE THE INVESTORS OF EXPENSIVE WEBSITES TO AVOID PENALTY WHEN WE ARE SPENDING LIKE HELL JUST TO BE POPULAR

Well, you see, your basic problem is, buying popularity is what Google most needs to penalize.

What the professional popularity-merchants do in a case like this is burn the domain name, take the site down and get it out of Google's cache, and start over with another domain name.

The other thing they do is, before they start a link-kiting or link-napping scheme, they make sure they can move their content over to another domain. It's part of professional preparation, just like a professional burglar might carry bribe money, stash bail money with a friend, or retain a lawyer -- or like a lawyer might carry malpractise insurance. You never _want_ to use it, but if you need it, you don't have a choice.

Macguru

11:29 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I sincerely hope typing IN THE SPAMMER FASION does not spread too much here,

This is why I just post this here, totally unaware of topic. It could have been interesting if properly formatted. I think my robotic spam filter has bad influence on me! :)

Stefan

11:32 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Are you sure you're penalized? If it's a newish site, it might just be Dominic or the normal amount of time that passes until much of the site is in Google. You mention that the index page is listed; the site hasn't been banned.

over $50,000 and close to $100,000

You start throwing those numbers around here and you can expect some sticky-mail soon... :-)

heini

11:38 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Welcome to the board, junobieta!

First we should clarify on some points:
How old is the site, when was it first indexed?

Second, what makes you think you have been penalized?

Third: did you have links placed on FFA sites, and when have they been placed?

Fourth: Do you already have the obvious links, like DMOZ, Yahoo, and other directories, as well as links from other sites?

bolitto

11:43 pm on Jun 9, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>SALUTATIONS

I'm betting it's an italian ISP ;)