Forum Moderators: open
CY
[edited by: heini at 4:21 pm (utc) on June 4, 2003]
[edit reason] no urls per TOS / thank you [/edit]
1 - no <h1> tag / text
2 - 3 pages of meta tags and scripts before any content
3 - meta tag URL to your main site really makes crosslinking hard to detect
4 - don't call your site map "Site Map"
5 - you have no worthwhile backlinks
6 - you have a lack of textual content past the keyword overstuffed front page
7 - (not SEO) the word ENTER doesn't have an <a on it!
Best of luck
Whey would a site map be penalized.
I think your jumping to conclusions based on a half baked index.
I've got a page named sitemap2 that was put up around Feb. Sure enough, with the unfinished index, it is white, but still shows up high in the SERPS for searches optimized on that page.
If it were penlalized, it would not.
GG said do not pay any attention to the toolbar now and instead to the rankings. Sounds like solid advice to me:)
However, this thread has a 0 pagerank because we talked about it...hehe..kiddin'
But possibly they are penalising pages which consist purely of links (and possibly if they contain only internal links).
In which case I would suggest a better way of dealing with that is to put some descriptive content on the page - take DMOZ as an example of pages of links which also have content surrounding them. That's good for users.
I don't think the name will make any difference. It's too easy for webmasters to just change it. If google want them out the index there are far easier and more reliable ways of detecting site maps than by name.
TJ