Forum Moderators: open
Google has a pretty amazing corporate culture. It's not all about stock options and flash cars, it's not even about 21st century working conditions or having a cool chef. I think Google engineers are about the least likely people to purposely hurt the quality of the service they provide.
I do know one of my competitors who was banned from Google.
I can't figure out what they did, but I'm curious.
They are a really big company and had a PR7 about 10,000 pages and a few thousand back links.
They came up for almost every term related to our industry.
Now they have been completely removed. And I think it happened in-between updates, so I assume it was manually done.
Maybe the only other thing I can think of is, they have black background with white text, and they have a link on the page to a printable page that's the same exact page but with white background and black text ( but it is a .php page). They have this for almost every page. Maybe this caused some kind of dup content and got them in trouble
Thanks.
I have not heard any credible accusations that google has done anything like this.
In fact - there are quite a few anti google pages on the web - even some containing VERY personal information [almost slanderous remarks] about a very handsome and intelligent google employee that will remain nameless but whose last names rhymes with butts.
I am 90% sure that someone using their position for a personal vendetta would not be around to do such a thing in the future.
As pointed out - I doubt google's chef or MOST employees for that matter could even do this if they wanted to.
It can be done - and has been done for legal reasons.
I don't think people have much to worry about. On the positive side - the impression I got at pubcon is that google is looking for more transparency on WHY someone was banned in the future...
I started from scratch and created a clean replacement site. Inexplicably, the new site was also banned. Two subsequent replacements were also banned. I still do not know why those sites were suddenly removed. Perhaps the employee(s) involved form a negative impression of individuals and it is difficult to change that impression.
It is difficult for human beings to be totally unbiased. GoogleGuy mentioned that they were trying to place more emphasis on “scalable filters”. I think that this would be a good way to eliminate human bias.
When sites disappear mysteriously, people are less inclined to invest time in creating quality sites. This is neither good for webmasters, search engines nor users.
"Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity."
-Hanlon's razor
If a site disappears without good reason from Google, FAR more likely it is do to bad programming of the algo, computer glitch, etc. than someone is out to get the site personally. One of my sites on -sj and -fi at the moment currently is getting the shaft with the anchor text of inbound links for some reason not being credited, as confirmed by an allinanchor search. However, I'm not so paranoid to think this is the result of some sort of personal vendetta. Almost surely an algo bug, or some sort of glitch in Google's computer hardware. I have little doubt that Google has more software bugs than petty, malicious employees. ;)
To do it it you would need the whole jig-saw not one piece.
+ you would need to see the whole picture, not just a portion of the box, no oops best not say that...