Forum Moderators: martinibuster
I run one of largest travel websites on the web. What would you veteran webmasters do in this situation, assuming you have no honest idea as to who is behind the "invalid clicks" that were supposedly generated. I'm not interested in one line off the cuff comments. I'm only interested in real "in my shoes" replies.
I'm obviously in hot pursuit of a lawyer. Just wondering what folks here have to say.
It's a partnership, and G holds all the cards.
I'd get my logs and everything in a briefcase and get this matter resolved ASAP if I were you.
I dunno.
For the kind of money being thrown around, it seems to me that this whole thing is made to be like a "game" at times and it's appaling to think that the principles wouldn't deal with these matters on a professional business-like platform.
I mean come on- either someone from your camp knowingly clicked on the ads or they didn't.
If they did not, and there is no clear violation of the TOS agreement, then some people need to sit and discuss this lucrative cash flow like professionals.
Or, maybe I'm wrong. Anyone in the travel / hotel industry received a HUGE AdWords credit recently?
//stay away from the lawyer thing, you have no rights in this relationship, you signed them off when you joined the program. //
Think about that a little more clearly.
Do you think if it was you, you'd simply hang around waiting for canned emails?
Obviously Google by now knows who the poster is...how many $300K refusal to pay emails do they send in a month for goodness sake.
Forget the forums, the Citizens advice bureau, and all the rest if it, get a Lawyer right away. Remember they have the burdon of proving you broke the TOS, and proving just does not mean than saying you broke them!
If such a case proceeded, Google would have to open there doors and show all the relevant documents, not just the ones that goes to there case.
Again this does not sound right somehow.
I got a $1 credit in June, but I don't know if it was travel related.
So put me down as a slight possible, bear in mind Google might have had a bit of trouble in this area, then get a contract lawyer to set things straight!
You are not necessarily bound by the terms of the contract as I'm sure your lawyer will know. If they don't know that, you need a better lawyer.
Let us know how you get on, and replace Adsense with Yahoo's offering in the meantime.
[edited by: AlexMiles at 11:27 pm (utc) on Aug. 27, 2005]
PS We received a mood clock last December, just like everyone else.
Think about that a little more clearly.
Do you think if it was you, you'd simply hang around waiting for canned emails?
He can do whatever he wants but getting a lawyer involved is not going to bring his account back. And if you read the T&C's they clearly state that it is within their right to withhold payment for invalid clicks. Again, why would google let go of such a lucrative cash stream unless they had serious problems with the account.
I think this is a computer generated screwup, by computer I meen at the google end!
Google should be given an opportunity to actually speak from a human being not a robot, to this member and to look into the matter, before taking it to the courts, but I cannot help feeling something is not Kosher here as I said in an earlier post.
"but getting a lawyer involved is not going to bring his account back", this is not 100% the case, if google are found to be at fault, a court can order the plaintiff to be put back in the position he was prior to the incident, and of course in the California courts, daaaaaaaaaaaamages usually take care of that!
I've got to run. Thanks for your posts. I won't post the outcome. :)
See you around folks. If you're religious, send a prayer up for us.
The account would undoubtedly be very important from Google's standpoint.
I simply cannot believe that a decision to ban an account of this nature would be taken lightly by Google. I suspect it was a group decision taken and approved at a very high level within Google. I am sure they have procedures in place for banning large accounts. You can be sure they were not banned for a few random invalid clicks.
Something is very wrong here. We clearly do not have all of the details.
Apparently, there is no communication between the parties which seems strange for an account of this size. Hopefully, that situation can be rectified.
Not all clicks were fraudelent (maybe some competitor set you up?), so Google can deduct a % to cover them and give you the rest. Your best bet is to be nice, and prove that you had nothing to do with the clicks.
They haven't been responding to you - and sometimes (in my experience - sending it to an ACTUAL lawyer will get a companies attention.
Then hire a lawyer if they don't respond. This is all you can do - Period.
It should not cost you anywhere near $300,000 to hire a lawyer :)
Keep in mind I said IF What you say is true.
Google knows almost everything. Plenty of people think they are clever and can slip one by Google. Maybe you can for a little while, but they ABSOLUTELY will not pay you if they know that you have been cheating.
What should happen if some percentage of clicks are invalid, but they don't know it was you - beats me. That is what lawyers are for. AFAIK - none of this has ever gone before a court before (to trial at least). The one case I know of google sued and the other commany caved.
It makes no sense for Google to can an advertiser bringing them in that much cash a year. Google either made a mistake - which the lawyers will be either quick to realize - or they didn't.
Very recently joined WW - Aug 23, 2005. And as a new poster to the WW AdSense thread, he supposedly operates a web site that generates very sizable AdSense revenues - the kind of revenue that most of us don't even DREAM about making., Comes out of the blue making flaming accusations about AdSense...
AND also "plugs" for Yahoo: What's the "We've already been approved for Yahoo ads" have to do with his alleged current AdSense dilemma? Other than to imply that Yahoo Ads will somehow be better than Google AdSense, a point which he certainly cannot prove.
Furthermore, why would this new poster waste so much time & effort making numerous posts to this and several other threads he started on similar topics, progressing from "eCPM Decrease" to " Disabled AdSense Account"? I'd be working on solving the matter... not making a bunch of disparaging posts.
this is NOT just a case of "this does not sound right" ... This is obviously a prime example of flimflam.
Remember, the experts always say "if something sounds suspicious, it probably IS suspicious..." Pay no heed to this person's drivel!
All the more so for the amount you are out.