Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Nobody seems to look for news during hurricanes so it's just normal that traffic on such portals should drop during tough times.
Couldn't prove it by abc,nbc,cbs, or msnbc
I would assume people would revert in intense crisis to news channels they trust more and that are primary sources and not secondary.
Heard it on Yahoo or BBC, BBC would still be more credible. Maybe I am getting old :¦ ;)
The dip was very clear, exactly on rita, dip on msn, yahoo, and google.
Usually this stuff is really hard to get figured out, that wasn't one of the things though, if this was jagger related then why would all 3 search engines dip at the same time, september 21 ish? Recall that Rita was cat 5 before it landed. People left, they'd just seen what happened when people didn't leave.
And as you note, the news sites didn't dip, which I'd also expect, since more people are logging in for news, so the regional absence + more other views equals no real change.
You would then be surprised about the lack of said massive drop on Yahoo for the August 29 event in New Orleans call Katrina, yes ¦ no?
You are not expecting me to actually look at the data before throwing out a hypothesis..? :\ ;)
And as you note, the news sites didn't dip, which I'd also expect, since more people are logging in for news, so the regional absence + more other views equals no real change.
Exactly you have to offset the people who couldn't look at any news channels vs the ones that were extra viewers in other regions. :)
Any clue what they are waiting for? Still testing, reviewing spam reports.
One thing new though - Googlebot seems to eat up Javascripts!
Not sure what it means but we might be onto surprises soon.
Well, actually it's not the first time it was reported but for some reason it seems to target .js on specific crawls.