Ive missed out quite a bit here, when did SAGA start?
Jagger just finished and I wasnt expecting a further update so soon.
LegalAlien
6:57 pm on Nov 14, 2005 (gmt 0)
Way to go 2by4! After thousands of posts, spanning three separate Jagger threads, the very last thing we want is to have to wade through more pointless blurb. We're all really tired; it's been a really l-o-n-g two months, so let's keep it concise, beneficial and on track guys, please!
Timona
6:58 pm on Nov 14, 2005 (gmt 0)
Essex_boy: No worries you have not missed too much Jagger3 is still going per what I can tell.
"saga" defined as: "a long story or novel, or a series of stories or novels" so it is not a new update just the sameold keeping going. :-)
zimba
8:27 pm on Nov 14, 2005 (gmt 0)
As GG has said in past postings>>>> Jagger 3 is showing on 66.102.9.104, still in flux and when stable will be moving across all DC's from early this week.
reseller
9:25 pm on Nov 14, 2005 (gmt 0)
Essex_boy
>>Ive missed out quite a bit here, when did SAGA start?<<
October 17, 2005 :-)
g1smd
10:05 pm on Nov 14, 2005 (gmt 0)
On default Google here in the UK, [66.249.93.104...] I see for a site:domain.com search that all of the supplemental pages are listed first (pages which are long ago 404, or are malformed URLs, etc), and only then are those followed by normal pages from the site. The root index page is very near the end of the list in each case. I see this on a lot of site listings at the moment...
flowermark
10:10 pm on Nov 14, 2005 (gmt 0)
My PR changed this morning as well. It changed from 5 to 4 for two datacenters and has since changed back too all 5s. (My site was a 4 before the udpate.)
bears5122
10:28 pm on Nov 14, 2005 (gmt 0)
I'm seeing the same PR fluctuations. Very odd.
eveolasov
10:44 pm on Nov 14, 2005 (gmt 0)
Okay - I've noticed site:www.homepage.com has beaucoup PR0 supplementary pages with a Feb. 6 cache........ The same pages are showing up on site:homepage.com with a November 9 cache and pretty good PR. These are the exact same pages. I see many many of these instances. I'm afraid a permanent redirect at this point could cause big trouble.
Any thoughts or advice?
zeus
10:52 pm on Nov 14, 2005 (gmt 0)
My question is just WHY did they not fix the non www issue and supplemental results DB - they did have a partly fixed version on the test server but thats also gone.
About the PR talk, forget that, its old PR that pops up sometime, what a month or so then you have something to talk about.
