Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Jagger - Part 2

         

Brett_Tabke

1:08 am on Nov 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

BillyS

1:15 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Peeps here can speculate all they want. They can hold onto hope that favorable results are J3. I've been quiet here, but I've been watching the results.

There are three sets of results that I can find. I don't believe that any of these are J3. Why is that? Because I use what I believe are search terms that are not common. I don't look for ones that I want to rank #1 for, I look at those that I should easily rank in the top 20.

I still think we are going to see the first set of J3 on the 11 C Class centers. That's because J1 was on 7 and J2 was on 9. The fact that Matt finished his workday on Friday and didn't bother giving any update is a big hint that they are still working on J3.

He also mentioned it would spread slowly after appearing on one center. Maybe that story has changed but I don't expect it to appear on three or four centers at the same time - something that peeps here keep seeing.

petehall

1:17 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Results on any DC will do me just fine thanks :)

I just wish they'd pick one and roll with it...

glitterball

1:23 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Yeah, I'm seeing very old cached pages there (66.102.11.99). There are pages that have been excluded by robots.txt for about a year in there too.

Dayo_UK

1:32 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>>>Jagger 3 is supposed to fix canonical issues and supplemental issues. Since they aren't fixed, then no, Jagger 3 hasn't even started yet.

Depends on how you see the fix.

If the Canonical url fix means that pages dont suffer from ranking problems if the non-www is indexed then the 66.102.9.104 results look encouraging (eg Homepages coming on top for some sites)

If the Supplemental fix means that supplementals dont outrank more recently crawled content - then again 66.102.9.104 is encouraging.

It was more encouraging last night though when it seemed to be applied to more sites.

However, I still dont rank :(

So I think 66.102.9.104 is missing something (that something might be what is on some of the other dcs - eg 66.102.7.104s?) - put them together - then perhaps we might be getting closer.

taps

1:38 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Can anybody see any movement across datacenters or within our 4 new jaggers?

Miop

1:39 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My rankings have improved a little (inner pages which were lost in the update) since the non-www problem was fixed, but not much, and the top serp is still a spammy site with doorway pages and cloaking.

I'm working on the theory that they haven't updated G yet with the canonical problems fixed - when I build a site, I do one step at a time and look at the results in case I need to roll it back again, so I'm (feebly) hoping G is doing the same!

RichTC

1:44 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



As at now in the UK the results look exactly like they were prior to the update starting - looks like a pointless exercise if you ask me.

On Wednesday the results were much better, some old non relevent sites had gone along with certain directory sites - now they are all back as before

If the UK results stick as they are it will all have been a total waste of time

petehall

1:46 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



As at now in the UK the results look exactly like they were prior to the update starting - looks like a pointless exercise if you ask me.

Pop 66.102.9.104 into your hosts file and try some searches :)

300m

1:47 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"66.102.9.104"

This DC is changing its cache dates, anyone else notice this?

MissusC

1:50 pm on Nov 5, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



"66.102.9.104"
This DC is changing its cache dates, anyone else notice this?

Yes, I see the number of supplementals is less AND I see the cache dates are later as in March and April rather than the Feb dates I saw before. Hope this will get better and better.

This 1222 message thread spans 123 pages: 1222