Update Jagger, Google Update Oct 18th, 2005

When can we expect a new PR update?

[jretzer]

Continued from here:
[webmasterworld.com...]

---

Anyone have any guesses as to when we can expect a new systemwide PR update?

[JuniorOptimizer]

Let me be the first to say: the results on 66.102.9.104 really suck! Keep on shuffling.

[normasp]

====================================================

GoogleGuy
Senior Member

view member profile
joined-Oct 8, 2001
posts:2837
msg #:338 9:37 am on Oct 26, 2005 (utc 0)

normasp, there's a way to tell us about the hidden text. Just do a spam report (search on Google) and use the keyword jagger2.

====================================================

Today is my day!
I can see my web again at updated DC's and after my second post in this forum GoogleGuy noticed me..
I'm so excited..
hahaha!

[edited by: normasp at 11:52 am (utc) on Oct. 26, 2005]

[jaffstar]

Difficult to be sure. Have you really checked all back links via alltheweb or an engine that shows them

I have scanned using MSN and Yahoo and taken unique results. If your brand name is a competitive keyword then you would be hurt, if its abccompanyname then you would rank.

Is it necessarily one keyword appearing in high % of anchors? or different keywords, which are money keywords appearing in a high % of anchors?

Keyword or different keywords or keyword1 keyword2 which would be keyword1keyword2.com.

Yes, these are on the money keywords, not company name as said above.

[tigger]

well if 66.102.9.104 is showing J2 then I'm happy

[Patrick Taylor]

Dayo_UK: So at the moment dont look for what is not there and should be - but look at what is there but shouldn't.

Wise words, I think. No point judging our own rankings for another week, maybe.

[adfree]

I am still puzzled about the PR distribution though. First time all sub pages receive a PR (which is 4) but the HP still remains at a 3, how does that go together when all incoming links hit the HP?

[Strider]

well hopefully 66.102.9.104 is not stable yet.
"direction in which things are moving" doesnt mean its tables of stone, does it?

[brokenbricks]

66.102.9.104 has the best results I've seen in a long time.

[Patrick Taylor]

puzzled about the PR distribution

I've seen this too. Possibly a result of the internal linking structure.

[reseller]

Dayo_UK

>>I guess for a lot of us stage 3 is where it is all going to happen.

Afterall GG says for ranking problems then wait until after stage 3 before sending reports etc.<<

I guess stage 3 would be to deal with both the Canonical & Supplementals issues. Accordingly and Expectedely we might see in future two happy gentlemen; Dayo_UK and steveb :-)

>>Spam feedback is what is required now - so I assume that most of the spam filters are being put in place on 66.102.9.* <<

Agreed.

Folks!

Please start reporting those spammers here:

[google.com...]

In the “Additional details:” section, you would use the keyword “jagger2″ (that’s “jagger” and the number two with no spaces in between).

Thanks.

[edited by: reseller at 12:36 pm (utc) on Oct. 26, 2005]