Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google Update Bourbon Part 3

         

Sweet Cognac

8:35 pm on May 27, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Continued From:

[webmasterworld.com...]



My whole site has a new cache date of May 25th. Maybe once these other sites around me get recached, I won't hold such an honorable top position. But at least Google has found my pages worthy to sit in the Search again.:) It seems strange to look at the stats and see Google in there, after 6 months of just seeing Yahoo and MSN referrals.

My website has plenty of outbound links, but they are on relevant pages. The problem my site has always had, was a lack of "inbound links." I got tired of searching for people to link to me (with all the spammy sites around) and gave up. So my pages have acquired some links naturally I guess(and I'll bet I still don't have more than 30 inbound links for the whole site) Still have a PR4, which I've had since it disappeared in Nov.

[edited by: Brett_Tabke at 8:54 pm (utc) on May 27, 2005]

Clint

4:09 pm on May 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



MikeNoLastName
>The three rules needed to get dumped SEEM to be:
1. High proportion of external links (including affiliate links) to internal links and/or content on the page. (exact proportion unknown)
2. Domain newer than 4 years. (over 4 MAY or may not be exempted if 1 & 3 exist)
3. Adsense Ads on the page. <

So far so good :-)

Lets take a look at this one excluding affiliate links for the moment and concentrating only on outbound and internal links:

>1. High proportion of external links (including affiliate links) to internal links and/or content on the page. (exact proportion unknown).<

Have done some counting for the pages which preserved their ranking and those lost it. I can see that the number outbound links shouldn't exceed the number of internal links. Maybe its a factor of:

Maximum Outbound links number either equal or preferably 10% less than the number of internal links.

As to affiliate links I'm looking at present at pages with affiliate programs reviews, both those which kept their ranking on the serps and those which lost it. Shall keep this thread posted.

As to AdSense, It might be a factor among other factors to identify the target pages but not a factor which alone cause a page to be penalized.


Regarding the first part of your post; that's not what I have seen. In place of where *I* was a week ago (on the 1st page of results for hundreds of search terms), I have now been replaced with "bogus" sites, link farms, other search engine type pages, sites with hidden text, sites from INDIA (this is in a USA English search ONLY), and loads of non-relevant hits! What do many of these hits have in common? Google ADWORDS and Adsense! Obviously Google is "giving special treatment" to sites that run their ads, and "rewards" to spamming sites as well! Again, also most of the hits are link exchange pages/affiliate links sites!

Interestingly, I also have 3 websites that are nothing but basic one page only sites (these are just an index page with 2 link exchange pages) that are their domain names for sale. They have shot up to the 1st or 2nd page of results at Google in a search for each of their respective fields. One is 1st on the 1st page now (all of them are linked to my main site). This is where they USED to be for years, but some time back they got trashed by Google and remained trashed. But now, they are back on top. That's of little consolation to me though since my main biz site is trashed.

nutsandbolts

4:24 pm on May 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Interestingly, I also have 3 websites that are nothing but basic one page only sites (these are just an index page with 2 link exchange pages) that are their domain names for sale...They have shot up to the 1st or 2nd page of results at Google in a search for each of their respective fields

I am seeing lots of this also. Not very funny seeing domain parked pages above sites with oodles of content...

Google must be working on "suggestion" rank - where the merest suggestion of a topic boosts the ranking of that page in the SERPS compared to those that are perhaps overdoing it (in Google's eyes) on the site optimisation/content/linking front....

Freedom

4:29 pm on May 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Google was a lot better search engine when it only had 2.3 billion pages indexed. Six billion more pages of #*$! doesn't make a better search engine.

Google scholar was the only good thing they came up with lately and I don't think that idea was their's.

Dayo_UK

4:32 pm on May 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



Freedom

The web has changed though.

If you compare it to looking for a needle in a haystack - the amount of hay has gone up a lot lot more than the amount of needles.

Freedom

4:36 pm on May 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



If the hay is #*$! and the needles are the golden nuggets of information, then I agree. There is more hay and more is not necessarily better.

MFA sites and scrapers must account for at least 2 billion pages. ;-]

Clint

4:46 pm on May 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



Interestingly, I also have 3 websites that are nothing but basic one page only sites (these are just an index page with 2 link exchange pages) that are their domain names for sale...They have shot up to the 1st or 2nd page of results at Google in a search for each of their respective fields

I am seeing lots of this also. Not very funny seeing domain parked pages above sites with oodles of content...

Google must be working on "suggestion" rank - where the merest suggestion of a topic boosts the ranking of that page in the SERPS compared to those that are perhaps overdoing it (in Google's eyes) on the site optimisation/content/linking front....


I hope to God they aren't bringing that cr@p back! That is the single most ABUSED thing on the internet. I haven't use the G-toolbar in a long time (malware) but last time I did it had that "rating area" where you would rate sites. I installed the toolbar again a few days ago and I no longer see that area. There is nothing stopping your competitors from going to your site and "standing" on the "0" rating for your webpages!

I don't know if you'd call these "domain parked pages". I registered and own the domains, and the way I try and sell them is I made a webpage for them. At any rate, speaking of *real* domain parked pages and something else odd; I forgot to mention that I have a few field-related domain names that are "pointed", "parked", or "forwarded" (whatever you want to call it) to my main business domain. When you enter these names in your address bar, their domain names will show in the address bar as well for all links clicked, but the content is the exact same thing for each (the content of my main site of course). I never even submitted these other domains to Google, and now **THEY** are showing up *INSTEAD OF MY MAIN DOMAIN* in searches for phrases where my main domain WAS showing up! (Although WAAAAAY down the results list now for search phrases). They even show up now for a search for my business name, where my main no longer does (again, although way down the results list)! This is one of the main things that PROVE how ****ed up this update is. People removed from G's index for their OWN BUSINESS NAMES, yet OTHER SITES now showing instead!

Dayo_UK

4:50 pm on May 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



Clint

Are you saying you have other sites that have the exact same content as your main site?

You probably should really have 301 redirected them to your main site or excluded Googlebot via Robots.txt. It does not really matter if you have submitted them or not - Google has ways of finding domains.

thefa

5:07 pm on May 28, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



MikeNoLastName
The more non-competitive, neutral, free content you offer (like published library book text ;), the more they'll like you.

I wish this could be true and for a while I had the impression it was. Bourbon just proved this to be wrong in our case.
Either we have some very obvious other problem or our site matches the "non-competitive, neutral, free content" definition and still got hit by Bourbon. We lost between 60 and 80% of the visits coming from Google.
Most of our content is the on-line version of a published library book...

Clint

5:10 pm on May 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



Clint
Are you saying you have other sites that have the exact same content as your main site?

You probably should really have 301 redirected them to your main site or excluded Googlebot via Robots.txt. It does not really matter if you have submitted them or not - Google has ways of finding domains.


Hello, well,.....yes and no. These are names that are in the same field as my business and main domain name. They don't have any kind of 'hosting package' nor do they have their own Cpanel areas. If anyone should happen to click their links anywhere, they are just directed/fwd'd/pointed to my main site via my main site's Cpanel. Their domain names show in the address bar, but the content is that of my main site. I would think it is these *other* domains that have the dupe content, not my MAIN site. So it should be THEM that's not showing up in hit results, not my main site, right?

If this is bad, then how would/could I change this in Cpanel?
Thanks.

Dayo_UK

5:16 pm on May 28, 2005 (gmt 0)



>>>I would think it is these *other* domains that have the dupe content, not my MAIN site.

Well - in an ideal world - yes.

>>>If this is bad, then how would/could I change this in Cpanel?

Hmmm - you might need to ask your hosts but you might be able to do it with .htaccess.

There have been 101 threads in the Apache forum about redirecting recently. (But I am not an expert so would not personally want to hand out code - in case I am wrong).

This 789 message thread spans 79 pages: 789