Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Allegra - Google Update 2-2-2005

         

illusionist

1:34 pm on Feb 2, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



My site which came back on december 26 update, seems to have disappeared again on this data center [216.239.53.99...] . Its notwhere to be found even in allinanchor, allintitle etc? I see majot change on that data center, is this a new update?

nuthin

5:30 am on Feb 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



anyone else notice DMOZ descriptions are being pulled and displayed as the snippet for the index page?

metagod

5:30 am on Feb 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



well that could play out with the same as my post....

duplicate content - but I don't think google is that silly to not know that domain.com and www.domain.com are the same.

Chico_Loco

5:31 am on Feb 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Hey, if you think I'm #*$!in', don't read the posts buddy - I'm just looking for answers here. If GoogleGuy does reply, feel free to read over that time too as it will most likely contain words which you aren't able to understand!

As for complaining - Well, when your brand name is taken by another party that is benefiting by being #1 for a search on your brand, then if you fell it's best to just sit back and take it.. I on the other hand would rather come on here, ask as many questions as possible, and learn from the answers that get posted.

I've spent quite some time building my brand, and now according to Google, I'm not even relavant enough to rank for my brand name - that, my friend, is the problem.

walkman

5:35 am on Feb 9, 2005 (gmt 0)



"Just make a good site, with good content and follow good practices. If this is your business, then you're are either a.) a cheap bastard or b.) an absolute idiot to depend upon organic search engine results to generate all of your revenue. "

ahhh...another preacher talking about good content and how that means good results. We've doen that part and aren't ranking not even for our domain.com. Not all of us have have a million spammy sites that can be ditched in a hearbeat and replaced with another domain. We might be cheap and idiots, but you aren't much better.

I'm buying a few already established domains and follow the 100 domain strategy. Spamming apparently is more honorable than complaining about bad results.

mikec

5:46 am on Feb 9, 2005 (gmt 0)



if you're brand has been hijacked perhaps you have a trademark /copyright issue that you might want to contend. if you'd like sticky me your url, and i'd be more than happy to look and see if i can figure anything out for you.

btw, No spamming here. I detest spam as much as the next. Just because I run several sites doesn't mean that I participate in shady SEO/spamming.

max_mm

5:50 am on Feb 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



walkman
said:

ahhh...another preacher talking about good content and how that means good results. We've doen that part and aren't ranking not even for our domain.com. Not all of us have have a million spammy sites that can be ditched in a hearbeat and replaced with another domain. We might be cheap and idiots, but you aren't much better.

Spot on!

Chico_Loco

6:03 am on Feb 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well, I'm not calling you a spammer.. I did take offence to this though:
If this is your business, then you're are either a.) a cheap *** or b.) an absolute idiot to depend upon organic search engine results to generate all of your revenue.

I can't control the fact that Google are a search monopoly... so I kinda have to roll with the fact that they were referring me about 90% of traffic. I've had more than one company attempt to diversify the referrers, however it just wasn't possible with the type of industry. We did some brand-building in the beginning, and then it grew thorough the work we've done and word-of-mounth.

I have a few people here helping me out, and unfortunately they will have to be let go - because 90% was taken away (though given also) by Google. If more people used MSN or Yahoo, this would be less of an issue (we're ranked good there).

So, on the off-chance that my #*$!ing will get something done to get the site ranked again, and keep those 3 people with jobs, then in their name I'll do it.

PS: Still waiting for GoogleGuy to PM me! :)

[edited by: eelixduppy at 10:03 pm (utc) on Feb. 18, 2009]

mikec

6:09 am on Feb 9, 2005 (gmt 0)



i'm not sure what your particular niche is, but never forget about the traditional marketing mediums. adwords also are very cost effective as long as you are good at targeting the correct terms. You have to be willing to spend money.

to be honest you should be focussing your attention on what you can do to remedy the problem. not what google can do. As i said before i'd be glad to look over your site if you'd like. I wouldn't count on getting help from google.

nzmatt

6:14 am on Feb 9, 2005 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



ahhh...another preacher talking about good content and how that means good results. We've doen that part and aren't ranking not even for our domain.com.

Yes...

I can't control the fact that Google are a search monopoly... so I kinda have to roll with the fact that they were referring me about 90% of traffic. I've had more than one company attempt to diversify the referrers, however it just wasn't possible with the type of industry.

And yes!

Why is it so hard for some of you (I don't want to name anyone Mikec) to understand/concede these simple points? You employ mind constructs and abstract subjectivity instead of relaying plain facts and using deductive reasoning to reach further understanding.

mikec

6:16 am on Feb 9, 2005 (gmt 0)



because you don't have a well rounded marketing plan. of course if you have no real marketing plan and depend on organic search for your referrals, most of them will come from google. it is, in fact, the most used search engine on the web.
This 823 message thread spans 83 pages: 823