Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
What? You mean you don't send out any of those drug related solicitations I get in my email every time I get my new messages.
I tell you I'm shocked, totally shocked ;).
I see things are still churning at the data centers, time to work on more html file size reductions and other stuff.
Analysis of index update, filter tweaks, and algo changes if any will prove interesting. I tried to track a couple of pages yesterday but I couldn't get a solid picture.
============
"This data center has what I recently saw and what I expect [216.239.39.104...]
this [216.239.37.99...] is showing some terrible stuff ( for me )
The interesting thing ( to me ) is that both have updated the pages with my recent deep crawl on the 6th and 7th and I am seeing my new pages on both.
Are there any conclusions to be drawn from that?
Is it safe to say that the update is an algo change only not a change in the data being used? "
<notSEdependant> Maybe we’ll call it “SED” (Search Engine Diversification) or “SOS” (Search Operability Strategy) someone can start SearchEngineDiversificationWorld dotcom (Brett?) </notSEdependant>
Ultimately, I’d like to see more competition in the search game; after all, the economics of search (millions of websites/businesses distributed to the world through a few major players) has spawned enormous advertising dollars driving some webmasters to corner traffic for advertising and not for end users. At the end of the day it’s all about traffic = money!
An interesting model would be “PPB” (Pay Per Bot) you get a one-year express inclusion in our robots.txt to spider all our pages for only $299(recurring annually in subsequent years to update your SERP’s.) to hard for webmasters to manage? No problem, hosts and ISP's can be the intermediaries and do a revenue share. :-)
-------------------
I hope you've got this right Walkman. If they do merge the 2 indices, Google will actually have things bang on track.