Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Congrats on your new rankings.
Frankly, words in this thread would be better used discussing the current algo / changes.
Amen to that.
In previous updates there used to be a separate "analysis" thread. So far I've seen about 95% whinging (myself included) and about 5% analysis (and I think a big chunk of that was me posting the same thing several times).
Look - Google giveth, and Google taketh away. Get used to it. I'm more interested in WHY it has changed and how to fix it.
Larry & Sergey,
Hope this reaches you. I am a well-wisher of Google & was a fan....uptil now. my website is online since 1999. for last 5 years, we have been on first page first site for our primary keywords. But, now with this recent algo change of urs, we are nowhere.
IrvingGuy,
We don't give a rat's ass about your results - we're rich man! You think we care about your results? You need a reality check.
Sgnd,
Larry and Sergei
But seriously, all of you who are promoting the idea that the press should get a hold of this also need a reality check. Try explaining what happened here to Joe Public - no chance!
If the press aren't interested in featuring something as radical and significant as the sandbox we'd better just forget about it. This happened almost 12 months ago and there has not been a single mention of it in the press, anywhere, worldwide. What does that tell you?
I belive the consensus is that this is a google BUG, that's why. See comments of people not ranking in the top 50 for their website.com.
Is there anyone here that is linked to hundreds of sites that are not linking back, and have not been affected by Allegra?
Yes. I have several hundred outbound links spread across my site which are not reciprocated. All links appear on map and photo pages which concern the area I am linking to.
I have had no penalties of any kind ... not yet anyway. I also see no reason why this should incur any penalties. They are all very relevant links to other sites in my slice of the world which my customers visit as they sail around the islands. Its all on the up and up. No tricks, and they are all direct links to the various sites.
<Added> I should mention that there are probably no more than 10 links out per page ... if that.
There is no "scraping" of text either. The links are all contained in (original copy) written paragraphs describing the various areas.
[edited by: Liane at 5:54 pm (utc) on Feb. 7, 2005]
"I'm more interested in WHY it has changed and how to fix it."I belive the consensus is that this is a google BUG, that's why. See comments of people not ranking in the top 50 for their website.com.
Agreed.
If anyone still doesn't believe Google is broken, have a look at this search:
<snip>
There are some decent sites at the top (none of which are anything to do with me - I'm not advertising here!).
But take a look what happens from the bottom of page 1 onwards.
[edited by: ciml at 8:14 pm (utc) on Feb. 7, 2005]
[edit reason] No keyphrases please. [/edit]