Forum Moderators: mack

Message Too Old, No Replies

5-25 MSN Search Update Continued

         

msndude

8:49 pm on Jun 2, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Continued from [webmasterworld.com...]

At the expense of repeating myself, I'm going to repeat myself. :-) Here are the guidelines I'm trying to follow when I post here:

I won't discuss the problems of particular sites in any public forum. As long as I can handle the volume, I'm happy to get "sticky" messages, though.

I also won't discuss competitors here -- they have their own forums, and I figure they already have enough people talking about them. :-)

I will not preannounce anything specific here; I might say "we're working extra hard over the summer to fight Spam," but I'm not going to post something like "look for a giant spam-killer release on April first!" After a release goes out and someone notices it, THEN I'll comment on it. If no one notices it, it probably wasn't worth talking about anyway.

Finally, I'm not going to reveal any secret Intellectual Property that would help someone build their own search engine or hack ours. Most of it's hard to explain anyway. :-)

[edited by: engine at 1:54 pm (utc) on June 5, 2006]

twebdonny

7:49 pm on Jun 5, 2006 (gmt 0)




MSNDude...Enjoy your vacation, shut down the PC, close the laptop, turn off the router, Enjoy YOUR VACATION.

seriously,

There is always time for work later...

Swebbie

9:47 pm on Jun 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm happy with MSN these days. I think their SERPs are comparable on the searches I do (mostly products for sale) to Google and Yahoo. Every major engine returns some head scratchers in the top 20 results, but that's always been the case. I can find search terms for which Google is best, Yahoo is best, and MSN is best. We're all limited, obviously, in the number of search terms we can check. It's basic statistics 101 - a tiny sample size produces inconsistent and ultimately useless results for drawing broad conclusions, especially when there are many billions of web pages out there.

steveb

12:45 am on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"But isn't this the SERPs before the update?"

The arabia results are nothing like before the update, except maybe by coincidence sometimes.

steveb

1:02 am on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Being a glutton for punishment, I checked my site: results on MSN and discovered like others they have dropped my index page... the page that had been indexed without a www even though it is impossible to access that URL since a 301 is on it.

Even worse, I noticed the first URLs listed for a site:example.com search returned a bunch of listings for pages that have been redirected for somewhere between nine months and eighteen months. Shockingly these show a "cache", but cache is:
Moved Permanently
The document has moved here.

In other words, they are somehow indexing the inaccessible inner server response crap as a "page".

Based on just this one example, it would seem likely that a reason that MSN is "losing" index pages is because instead of indexing the actual page, they are very stupidly indexing the server response somehow when a page has a 301 on it (from non-www to www, or other reasons).

Label_Lady

3:47 am on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



msn is actually doing a better job of crawling and indexing our site than the other search engines.

Rx Recruiters

5:38 am on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The search.arabia.msn.com/ results are exactly the same results as I was getting BEFORE the update. I am currently looking at a search term side-by-side with the Arabia, the A9 powered by Windows Live, and the MSN Search. The A9 and MSN are exactly the same orgainc results, while the arabia is showing the old serps from before the updates.

In the MSN and a9 search, 4 out of the 10 top results are from subdomains one company who spams the engines, 3 are different URLs of the same company, 1 is a domain name landing page.

In the old results (http://search.arabia.msn.com/), every URl in the top 10 for this particular search is a seperate and distinct URL, and all seem to have been around awhile, and are known authorities in the area. Not so with the new update.

When you get to competitve terms, this update yields HORRIBLE results. Please roll back to the SERPs from [search.arabia.msn.com...] - those were the type of results that made me swith to Windows Live from Google, but now I can't seem find anything! Bring back the authority sites and stop rewarding domain name spam, PLEASE!

wariental

11:19 am on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Label_lady, thats because it does it faster than any other search engine. However, I have found google to index every single page and never drop it and in msn I've lost pages in the index in the past that have come and go.

Since the new alogorithm I can't get anything new indexed or the speed at which msn indexes has been really slow lately.

econman

4:21 pm on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Has anyone else studied the SERPs on arabia.search.msn.com?

The SERPs are quite different from those currently being shown on msn.com; can anyone else confirm whether they are -- or are not -- roughly the same as the old msn.com results (before this recent algo update)?

CainIV

4:51 pm on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yes, and on all accounts in MSN Arabia and US there is too much emphasis placed on keywords in the domain name, subfolder name or page name, and many of the authority sites seem to have been vaulted into a funny mix of the top 20. Some decent sites, and some absolutely poor choices.

chrisv1963

4:57 pm on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



"Has anyone else studied the SERPs on arabia.search.msn.com?
The SERPs are quite different from those currently being shown on msn.com; can anyone else confirm whether they are -- or are not -- roughly the same as the old msn.com results (before this recent algo update)?"

From what I see and remember I can confirm that the arabia.search.msn.com results are roughly the same as before the recent update and much better than the results on search.msn.com

crobb305

5:49 pm on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



ChrisV,

I originally thought the arabia results looked like an old/pre-update dataset. But then I noticed some websites ranked well that I have not seen ranking in months. Could be a test of some sort?

chrisv1963

7:09 pm on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



You could be right, crobb305, maybe it is a test. If it is a test, then I do like the results so far, except for the deep crawling MSN still has to work on.

Garya

7:32 pm on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Dosn't matter to much brazil, arabia, japan, they are all much better then us results.
Anyone notice it worse today and cache have been rolled back 5/24

wariental

10:21 pm on Jun 6, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Iam seeing new cache, but its not making a difference, the same poor results since the new algorithm.

CainIV

4:30 am on Jun 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Certainly could be a test, I expect we will see some big changes in the near future from msn search.

angiolo

9:22 am on Jun 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



> the same poor results since the new algorithm

For me it's exactly the opposite!

dauction

7:12 pm on Jun 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Based on just this one example, it would seem likely that a reason that MSN is "losing" index pages is because instead of indexing the actual page, they are very stupidly indexing the server response somehow when a page has a 301 on it (from non-www to www, or other reasons).

That makes sense on my end Steve .. Index is gone for me ... 301 www to NON www and even though I see my other pages nothings ranking .

dauction

7:26 pm on Jun 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Anyone know if this "update" is over .. is it still in flux.. what the heck is going on with it?

dauction

7:36 pm on Jun 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I see whats going on ..most sites with adsense on them are going to the back of the line

dauction

7:41 pm on Jun 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



This isnt about doing an update this is about putting the hurt of Googles revenues ...and I guess we're just collatoral damage if we use adsense!

They were selective in going after the high traffic high revenue sectors air , hotels , mutual funds , stocks etc....

Martin40

9:40 pm on Jun 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



No, I think the're just trying to fight spam (while we're taking the punches).

dauction

10:04 pm on Jun 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Not sure what to do ..if anything

What about the missing Index pages ..what does that signify ..

A.that they think you are spamming
B. that they simply screwed up on handling 301 redirects

Everyone that had there index pulled should post so we can see if we can find a common issue

I'll also ask again..anyone know if this update is over?

steveb

10:55 pm on Jun 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It now appears I've lost all rankings for all pages on the site mentioned above, though many still appear for a site: search.

This includes searches that I've been #1 for since MSN started, including domain name and stuff like that.

TheMoneyGuy

10:59 pm on Jun 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



In my sector, I am relieved to see a major clean up of the serps. Although I am down 2-3 pages from the top, I at least feel better about competing with my sectors authority and long-standing quality sites.

Before this last update, it was very disheartening to see so much subdomain spam, adsense scraper sites, redirect doorways and other garbage sites etc.. ahead of us.

Keep up the good work MSN!

Shurik

5:29 am on Jun 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The SERPs in my sector look pretty clean. Virtually no spam left. The SERPs for the most competitive terms now resemble the mix of Yahoo and google results. As it stands now I think the update is success (at least in my sector). My only concern is the "lost pages" syndrome that MSN periodically suffers from.

ramachandra

6:00 am on Jun 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This week I am seeing fluctuation in SERPs for my main keyword. My site use to rank on 3rd position till last week, yesterday dropped to 6th and now its on 2nd page.

jdMorgan

6:26 am on Jun 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Well, despite msndude's "should be done by Monday" (referring to May 29th) statement in the previous thread, the SERPs are still changing -- at least from where I stand with the informational site I described previously. For the past two days, it has been stable on the first results page at position 7. Not as high as it used to be, but far better than halfway down page 3 where it's been for the past two weeks.

I'm aware that this is yet another 'sample of one,' but it caught my eye because, of all the sites I have anything to do with, this one is likely the cleanest, oldest, most authoritative, and theoretically most proof against any kind of penalty/filters. Also, several of my less-deserving sites have remained virtually unscathed, so when this update buried my 'best' site, it was a real eye-opener.

I forgot to mention in my previous post that the site stayed well-placed in the previously-discussed arabia.search.msn.com results. And again, I mean ranking for the single most-definitive keyword.

The page in question now has a cached page date of 05-June, so it was re-crawled shortly before recovery.

So from here, it looks like the 'authority' weighting has been dialed back up. Anyone else?

Jim

rajraj

8:30 am on Jun 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This MSN "update" or whatever is driving me crazy, peoples are talking about their ranking being lose but my site have totally diasappeared and cannot been seen at any pages for my keywords. Have checked all the back-link and they all are intact and MSn too shows that but what is weird is that last week my site got listed in Dmoz and soon dmoz clone too have picked that up but for some reason MSN is not showing those link, while Yahoo (which crawl usually slower than MSn) have indexed those link.

Secondly, the site which are now showing up on first page for my keywords were down in the dump before this so-called "update" and the site which are 1st and 2nd of the first page even on google and yahoo are being seen at 3rd and 4th pages. What is interesting to see is that all the sites which are on first 5 pages are all sub-pages of the site and none of them are index page (i.e. "www.example.com/widget.htm").

WebPixie

3:09 pm on Jun 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I just wanted to pipe in with my 1 cent worth.

I, too, have noticed a huge change in the quality of results for multiple terms we track. Some termd completely unrelated to other terms, so it's not just one area I've looked at.

Right now, on one of our major terms, a PR8 blog page with 1 page talking about the term is sitting happily at #2, while quality site with MANY pages related to the term are completely gone. Duplicates of the same site are listed twice on some pages with example.com/something.html and example.com/somethingelse.html a couple results below it.

There are 3 blog pages listed on the first page for the above term and the first page really consists of sites most people would laugh at.

On other terms, well know, high content sites have been replaced with tiny spamish (recycled article content) sites that are a joke, or blog sites that just happen to mention the word in their daily rantings.

My site is completely gone of the results for our major terms, which is a bit upsetting considering I have done my darnedest to make sure it was original and worth visiting, building my site around what would help my visitors... unique content and such.

I realize msn is going through growing pains, so I am trying to wait it out, but after staring at the results daily hoping that "today will be the day" it is better, I am feeling a bit down.

Truthfully I did feel the other results were better, and I wasn't listed in the top 5 or anything, but at least it had sites that showed nice content for what you were looking for.

Just my 1 cent opinion.

xspace

3:46 pm on Jun 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I think that MSN programmers was drunked at 25.May.

The MSN should be renamed MNS as in

Make No Sense ....results.

This 137 message thread spans 5 pages: 137