Forum Moderators: mack
also reuters is repeating [today.reuters.com] the story:
NEW YORK (Reuters) - Time Warner Inc is closing in on a deal with Microsoft Corp. to team up on an online advertising service to compete with Google Inc, the Wall Street Journal reported on Tuesday, citing people familiar with the talks. The paper said the two companies were now focusing on a deal that would combine their advertising-related assets, with little or no money changing hands. It said they expected to reach an agreement before the end of the year, but that it was still possible that Time Warner's America Online unit could strike a deal with competitor Google instead. Time Warner has been holding talks with both Microsoft and Google over AOL, sources familiar with the situation have told Reuters and other media.
Previous threads on subject:
[webmasterworld.com...]
[webmasterworld.com...]
A different issue seems to be the mail interface which still is proprietary in the client.
I hate AOL, but, eventually they look like they are about to do something sensible.
Why it took them so long to come to an easy decision is another topic!
I suspect AOL is going to get sold off from Time Warner and this is part of the process of making it attractive to MS.
MS should buy AOL from Time Warner, it is good for the long-term, I'll live with the hit on my MS shares in the short-term.
This is a major coup for MS whether they pick up AOL total or not!
Also whoever loses this will be buying big on the net to catch up so watch for loads of aquisitions from the losing party
Any ideas of who else they may go for in a bidding war to become the dominent player in
Search
Contextual Advertising
steve
AOL is worth whatever people are willing to pay for it, and TW execs can afford some good stuff to smoke now. Apparently it is a done deal: "(MSNBC) Source: Search giant would pay $1 billion for 5 percent stake in online unit"
[msnbc.msn.com...]
Looks like they bought the right to keep AOL serving their ads, and have a foot in the door when it comes to TW content. $1 Billion seems like a lot, but then, losing AOL would not have been a good thing. $1 Billion in stock can evaporate in minutes.
and there are thousands of smaller ISPs
what's to stop MS / Yahoo offering their own ISP services, or buying out hundreds of smaller ISPs for peanuts and undercutting AOL and eventually putting them out of business?
(Yahoo already do offer broadband with BT in the UK ...)
What does AOL have that other ISPs don't?