Forum Moderators: buckworks & skibum

Message Too Old, No Replies

Sudden increase of CPC recently?

My campaigns are full of inactive keywords.

         

fischermx

6:37 pm on Apr 5, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I didn't review my campaigns since last week, I remember a campaign with arround 1000 keyword in which I had about 150 "inactive for search".
Today I have 750 "inactive for search"!

Does anybody get any similar to this recently?

kempozone

7:30 pm on Apr 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



etr06

still waiting for response....

I really don't care too much about it as it only affects one campaign. I am also using AdCenter to supplement the lost traffic, however.

kz

webpublisher

10:00 pm on Apr 7, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Did they really say this or is this your intrepretation?

"Google responded to my e-mails saying that my affiliate site lacks a quality page score. They don't see any value in it, therefore I must be put out of business."

I wonder if one removes affiliate links as an experiment - minimum bids will lower?

CycleGeek

4:18 am on Apr 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'm a Google investor and have been following this story with some interest. It seems that this CPC issue has only occured in the last week or so - somebody at the Yahoo message board brought it to my attention only now.

My question is whether this increase in CPC has happened prior to last week and March 31st or whether it seems to be a reaction to bad numbers between January 1 and March 31. If it's been going on all quarter I'd better get "long" for earnings release; but if it's only been happening recently I'd be almost certain that the results from Q1 were disappointing.

Thanks for any responses - it's a real help to me.

manx

5:24 am on Apr 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



This happened on April 5 2006, As if a
Really stupid algo switch was flipped --
And, it seems to have happened to ALOT
of people.

For me, it happened in (very successful) campaigns
that have been running for over a year, some for over
2 years with Very little changes to them.

The k/w's & ads affected were Highly Targetted to the
landing page. There would be Very Little I could do to "increase quality".

For the campaigns affected, I will be taking my advertising money to Yahoo.

If they did this because of bad performance in Q1,
then they better fire their Financial Wizards, cause
they have just LOST a Bundle of Advertising $'s.

They have KILLED Numerous Very Targeted Ads from
what I can tell be reading these posts.

And, If they think Companies are going step up and fill Affiliate Ad's shoes they are Badly mistaken.

Smart Companies know they are getting a Great deal
in Affiliate advertising. And, many of these companies don't have the Experience in advertising
that is handed to them by affiliates.

[edited by: manx at 5:32 am (utc) on April 8, 2006]

koncept

5:28 am on Apr 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The increase in minimum bids has been going on since they implemented it, in August 2005. (is that right?) BUT the sudden, widespread, outrageous minimum bids is definitely something new, at least for me. It hit my campaigns suddenly on April 5th and to an even further degree on April 6th. So yes, it is something new. (hence this thread).

My traffic is far less than half what it used to be, and my spend is also less than half.

I no longer think this was a cash grab because I think they'll actually take a loss for it. I now think they are truly trying to optimize their ad serving for users and I'm working hard on my site to hopefully gain a better quality score. However, I do think that they acted rather savagely and left too many questions unanswered in the process. I am definitely looking around for new traffic sources now and putting more effort into SEO.

Google - I used to love you but you broke my heart! :)

CycleGeek

5:33 am on Apr 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Excellent! Thanks for the clarification - now that I know it definitely seems to have happened on April 5th I can be pretty sure that the previous quarter may have sucked and the extra revenue won't be hitting the books on their earnings release April 20th.

That, coupled up with the massive stock sales and evidence of fraud out there pretty much seals the deal on Q1 06 - I think I'll go "short" into earnings.

[edited by: Woz at 10:29 am (utc) on April 8, 2006]
[edit reason] No Self URLs please, see TOS#13 [/edit]

Jon12345

10:51 am on Apr 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I've been hit too. Now 300 adgroups have zero impressions.

One thing I have noticed is that the largest increase is always the same but it is in two tiers.

e.g.

1. £0.10 to £4.50, or £0.75 to £4.50

2. £0.10 to £2.25, or £0.75 to £2.25

(hypothetical figures used to avoid TOS problems)

Maybe if they really don't want your site they stick it up to the maximum. Else they stick it up half way. Make sense?

webpublisher

12:01 pm on Apr 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well I have just emailed the rep I have dealt with over the last few years to see I can get to the bottom of exactly what is going on. I trust he will give me a straight answer and avoid giving me the template response if you know what I mean!

da_clicks

1:52 pm on Apr 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Just curious,

Of all the people experiencing the issues, how many are affiliates and how many are actual merchants?

I manage several accounts, my merchant accounts have been unaffected, but a couple of the affiliate accounts got hit.

So, instead of a technical issue, is it really another wave of elimination of affiliate ads?

I would be curious to hear from those who have been affected - affiliate or merchant?

exmoorbeast

2:08 pm on Apr 8, 2006 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



aff
This 229 message thread spans 23 pages: 229