Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
Over and done with?
All done all through?
Throughout this entire update, everflux as been adding in new data, and re-arranging the results, on J1-3.
I changed every page of my site, to remove the javascript redirects(legit redirects to load orphaned pages into framesets), and to impliment a new javascript menuing system to remove the dependance on frames. I also created a sitemap for the site. All things I needed to do anyway to both improve the user experience, and to further improve my rankings. I have watched the data be indexed, and my site's pages in most keyword combinations move (mostly up), while other sites in the serps remaining mostly where they were. This movement (everflux) has occured within all the Jagger steps.
IMHO What GG was referring to as FLUX after the J3 update might be changes AFTER the J3 update, which has not yet been rolled out to all the datacenters, therefore not yet ready for the FLUX you are wanting to promote.
It is still MHO that what we are seeing is the rollout. Not the changes after the rollout.
Back to Watching
WW_Watcher
Edited to add,
I also implimented the .htaccess mod to do the redirect from non-www to www, and I started all these changes right before J1, when GG was reccomending the javascript redirect issue, and the WWW vs Non-WWW issue.
>>IMHO What GG was referring to as FLUX after the J3 update might be changes AFTER the J3 update, which has not yet been rolled out to all the datacenters, therefore not yet ready for the FLUX you are wanting to promote.<<
Then what do you call the changes within the same Jagger3 DC 66.102.9.104 that most of the folks have been witness to?
- Everflux? of course not.
- rolling out J3 to other datacenters? of course not.
- FLUX? yes of course :-)
I see the saga continues ;(
I don't think .9 is now showing the old .7 results as several people have stated. Firstly, we are in these listings in pretty much the same positions as on yesterday's 9., whereas we were way down on 7. Also, this is showing additional indented pages for a site directly under the initial listing, whereas these additional pages were missing on the old .7 – that sounds a bit confusing, but I’m sure everyone knows what I mean.
I also have a question -- does anyone know why a cache date is shown for a site for some search terms, yet is missing for the same site for other terms? Anchor/title text, description snippet and everything else remains the same for both listings. This is certainly not critical, or really related to Jagger, but it’s something I've been meaning to ask for ages and just never got round to it. Thanks!
Without knowing if any of these pages that the 2 people have reported movement on have been changes, or if they have added, or removed, or changed the linking structure within their site, or ANY other site in the serps with them, or any other site that may have added, changed, or deleted a link to them. All of which can effect a change in the order of the serps, I cannot exactly, but it sounds like the everflux that goes on everyday, all day.
I vote for Everflux.
Back to working, enough watching for now
WW_Watcher
>>I also have a question -- does anyone know why a cache date is shown for a site for some search terms, yet is missing for the same site for other terms? Anchor/title text, description snippet and everything else remains the same for both listings. This is certainly not critical, or really related to Jagger, but it’s something I've been meaning to ask for ages and just never got round to it. Thanks! <<
I'm not sure whether this could be the reason or the answer to your question. But just wish to mention that both TW, SEW and Matt wrote something about the recent "Cache issues"
[mattcutts.com...]
[edited by: LegalAlien at 10:16 pm (utc) on Nov. 12, 2005]
This is now getting silly.
Hi reseller
Not so bright and cheerful today -- did you run out of Danish cappuccino? Wish I could sticky you a creamy Lavazza :))
Thanks for the link -- I'll check that out now.
