Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
>>reseller, I am seeing the two different versions of j3 (.7. and .9.) at all datacenters, plus some flux.<<
I see version .9. only on .9. and .11.
But as you said correctly version .7. can be seen on most of the DCs.
Question is which one is Jagger3? version .9. or .7. or both?
Personally I think its version .9.
Matt also wrote something about .9. in his latest J3 weather report:
* Jagger3 was visible starting at 66.102.9.104 around 11/4/2005. Jagger3 is not widely visible yet (it might also be at 216.239.51.104), but I expect it migrate to other data centers over time.
[added] Unless the folks at the plex have decided to proceed with .7. and left .9. to age on .9. and .11. :-) [/added]
[edited by: reseller at 7:41 am (utc) on Nov. 19, 2005]
I think I was justified in being 'rude' Tigger
if thatt is so what about if your link partenaires discover it and remove your links as well?By the next PR update I guess you will lose some PR and some good rankings ,am I wrong?
Zikos, My sites have never built link relationships, they always seemed too shaky and have always taken a bashing during algo updates.
My main point this morning is an anti spam message. If you do anything to your website in order to list higher on search engines ... you are a spammer. Call it what you wish, target marketing, market forces or just plain competition ... you are unnaturaly affecting a search engine listing and that's taking the food from the mouth of someone more worthy than you.
Get with it ... SPAM STINKS and so does anyone who uses it.
I think the problem is we all have different ways of running our websites/business and some of us need that affiliate income to pay wages and bills and unfortunately I'm one of those. Also this update has worn me so down maybe I wasn't putting myself over well - either way I think we both understand each other and its time to move on