Update Jagger - Part 2

[Brett_Tabke]

Continued from
[webmasterworld.com...]

[Markoi]

From Matt

Matt Said,
November 3, 2005 @ 4:21 am

Mike, J3 has less to do with spam and more to do with general indexing. It’s hard for me to estimate how it might affect your site without knowing any specifics..

[reseller]

Hi Folks!

Especially those friends who don´t agree with me, including Dayo_UK ;-)

I wish to ask you this simple question?

Do you see the results of the followings Jaffer3 Front Troops DCs have been spreading to other DCs since this morning after the off/on incident? Yes or No!

216.239.53.99
216.239.57.99
66.102.7.99

Thanks!

[Dayo_UK]

Reseller (Yes still here;))

I dont agree that they are Jagger3 - they may be laying some groundwork - who knows - but we know there is more to come.

Cant see them spreading - In fact they are not the same as seen at about 6am this morning AFAIK.

Cheers

Dayo

[leeds1]

try this - best, improved results I have seen

[66.102.9.104...]

[saooop]

Reseller, the results that I see on those DCs look the same as the results that were 'rolled back' for a few hours on 66.102.9.104 the other day. Those reverted to the J2 results within 24 hours. Aren't these DCs doing exactly what 66.102.9.104 did the other day - as it was expected that they would?

[spaceylacie]

Hate to tell you this, reseller, but I think the ones I predicted are actually the correct ones. Now I'm htting the same serps as my default google.

64.233.161.104
66.102.11.99

<edit- same as the other results mentioned above>

[taps]

oops...

just took a look at [66.102.9.104...] and did a search. After that I clicked onto the Google logo in the upper left corner and got an error - my browser tried to load

[66.102.9.104...]

Tried that on Firefox (Mac) and IE (Windows).

A nice little bug?

[edit: change xy to de - examplified too much ;-)]

[edited by: taps at 3:22 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]

[Eazygoin]

leeds1>>
An interesting phenomenon has appeared on this DC.[66.102.9.104]

If I check a product keyword, it shows two URL's as follows, one at position 12 and one at 16 in the SERP's

Category> Sub category
Category> Sub Category> Specific item

But both for the same item keyword AND item number

[edited by: Eazygoin at 3:22 pm (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]

[leeds1]

I get

[66.102.9.104...]

[Dayo_UK]

Actually Reseller.

I would say the data you are talking about is on:-

216.239.53.104
216.239.57.104
216.239.63.104
64.233.189.104
66.102.7.104

or .99 at the end - however your prefer to access them.

and for a couple of sites that suffered with Canonical url bugs - there is some encouragement - perhaps it is laying groundwork.