Forum Moderators: Robert Charlton & goodroi
J3 has less to do with spam and more to do with general indexing. It’s hard for me to estimate how it might affect your site without knowing any specifics....
Sounds scary to me!
Seriously though, the correct place to report specifics is using the keyword jagger2 (we're still in part 2) on the spam report form at [google.com...]Put Jagger2 in the additional notes box?
What if there are notes to add too?
*SIGH* I guess I'll be getting some work done today after all.
Sounds exciting to me :)
>>>Sounds scary to me!
Sounds exciting to me :)
I now think the results everyone was complaining about on a small number of data centres was a preview of this new "ranking" :)
Oh dear.. if I'm right there's going to be a few unhappy webmasters in the world.
[edited by: petehall at 11:43 am (utc) on Nov. 3, 2005]
66.102.11.99 not sure I want those results but can live with them :)
That is good search?
Not a very competive term and only very very few in an allintitle:keyword search - even less if you exclude supplementals. Title is still important in G. (and it is on a root page I guess)
Does anyone else think the removal of these results and then the sudden collapse of DC's is interesting? I think they may have been Jagger3, dispite information supplied.
Curiouser and curiouser!
Time will tell!
