Update Allegra - Google Update 2-2-2005

[illusionist]

My site which came back on december 26 update, seems to have disappeared again on this data center [216.239.53.99...] . Its notwhere to be found even in allinanchor, allintitle etc? I see majot change on that data center, is this a new update?

[arubicus]

"What’s interesting is that it can still be found on searches for it's own “domain” name straight up (so I assume it’s not been dropped) but on “target keyword + domain” I only see other websites where it is listed, referenced or linked? Looks like a filter on keyword clusters or a filter/penalty on the domain? Sailorjwd, Firefox does not make a difference in this case."

We are seeing the same. But searching own company(unique) name there is no "more results from..." link like usual.

searching a keyword + domain is a bunch of other pages linking to us but we are nowhere to be found.

If we do a search for our domain it does not show title or description nor is there an option to view cached version. In the results for the company name it shows as being cached on feb 1st.

[Imaster]

I am also seeing a different set of results (terrible for me) at [64.233.161.147...]

Currently I am monitoring results at the following datacenters:

[216.239.53.99...] [bad]
[216.239.39.104...] [good]
[64.233.161.147...] [terrible]

[edited by: Imaster at 4:43 pm (utc) on Feb. 3, 2005]

[skippy]

I still don't understand the mechanism as to why Firefox shows normal (good) search results for me and IE6 shows my site deeeep in the results.

Did you clear the cache?

I can find my domain at number one now at the following datacenters with a chnge in the serps brutal but better

64.233.171.99
64.233.171.104
64.233.171.105
64.233.171.147

[sailorjwd]

My site is also #1 on those data centers listed above... what does that tell me? Are those the future results about to be implemented?

My visitors are still down 70%

Note, I'm not a website developer nor am I SEO knowledgeable.

[Imaster]

I can find my domain at number one now at the following datacenters with a chnge in the serps brutal but better

64.233.171.99
64.233.171.104
64.233.171.105
64.233.171.147

The above IP addresses show the exact same results (very good ones) for me. There doesn't seem to be any difference in the serps. Thats how it looks from where I am checking it.

But the following IP addresses have completely different serps on each of them.

[216.239.53.99...] [bad]
[216.239.39.104...] [good]
[64.233.161.147...] [terrible]

Which ones are working for you?

[arubicus]

Checked the 3 datacenters.

[216.239.39.104...] [good] - What is different on this one is that is shows the "more results for..." and has the the dual result from the site.

[216.239.53.99...] [bad] - No "more results for..." and only a single result from the site. Even in other keywords I search for. Poor results.

[216.239.53.99...] [terrible] - No "more results for..." and only a single result from the site. Even in other keywords I search for. Poor results.

[edited by: arubicus at 4:53 pm (utc) on Feb. 3, 2005]

[djgreg]

Only a few changes on all changing datacenters for my sites. But the index on 216.239.39.104 for example is VERY old. For all keywords I monitor it has only half the results the index on .com has. And there are sites in from my domain which don't exist any longer since years.

greg

[arubicus]

Anyone that is having problems, if you put in yoursite.com does it show the title and description?

[Imaster]

I am having a problem with one of my site, but using site.com at all the ips show me the title/description perfectly.

[incrediBILL]

>> I am also seeing a different set of results (terrible for me) at [64.233.161.147...]

Just out of curiosity I checked that server and my results were even better than the others, strange.

Google is definitely voodoo magic, guess I need to get more garlic and a goat's head for tonight's ritual dance.