Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Update Florida - Nov 2003 Google Update Part 4

         

Kackle

5:57 am on Nov 22, 2003 (gmt 0)



Continued from: [webmasterworld.com...]

Kackle - can you explain the "dictionary" for me? And how I might benefit from it - Im reading your posts hard but dont see where youre coming from.

Sure. But you have to act quickly. Google will fix this one just like they fixed the hyphen.

1. Google is depreciating pages/sites that are over-optimized for certain keywords or keyword combinations. It does this by looking up search terms in a dictionary of target keywords or keyword pairs that it has compiled. This dictionary is Top Secret, because if you knew what was in the dictionary, you could avoid these words in your optimization efforts.

2. If the search term or terms hit on a dictionary entry, the search results for that user's search are flagged. This means that before the results are delivered, the order of the links, or even the inclusion of links, are adjusted so as to penalize pages that have overoptimizated for those terms. Most likely the title, headlines, links and anchor text are examined. It's possible that external anchor text pointing to that page has also been pre-collected and is available for scanning, but this is much less likely. (Besides, external links are not something within your immediate control, so don't worry about it right now.)

3. You want to find out which keywords that are relevant to your site are in Google's dictionary. Compile as many relevant keywords you can think of that searchers might use to find your site. Now take these words singly and in pairs, according to how users might search. Run two searches for each combination and compare the results.

4. If the results are strikingly different for the pre-filter and the post-filter search on a particular term or combination of terms, it means that some variation of those terms has been flagged because something was found in Google's dictionary.

5. Do lots of searches and you can come up with a list of "sensitive" words that you'll want to avoid when you re-optimize your pages.

It's a nice weekend project.

lgn1

6:14 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Sorry James_Dale

We have ranked in the top for our category for years, and
we knew who our closest competition was also. Except for one competitor, we all got dropped.

bunltd

6:20 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



lgn1, James_Dale:

we were dropped along with many of our best competitors. Removed kw1 from a search for kw1 kw2 region and we show up. kw1 appears to be the "bad" word causing us to drop.

What to do about it, when it describes what we do - I haven't decided. Hoping that Google will wake up.

LisaB

James_Dale

6:21 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I am not necessarily referring to your category in the DMOZ-Google directory. It depends which categories Google decides to pull the results from. Some of these may be from their standard public directory, and others are coming from their real directory, which is far more comprehensive.

When you carry out a standard search in Google now, it shows the same results as their directory search. This is not a coincidence or a mistake.

willardnesss

6:25 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Here what I am seeing as your best shot at being #1.

if your site is bluewidgets.com, and you are optomized for blue widgets with many incoming 'blue widgets' anchortest links....YOU HAVE VANISHED,

BUT, if you have paid to place an ad page on a huge broad info page ith PR6-7-8 related to your niche (example: widgetworld.com which has thousands of pages about all different widget subjects), that page could do very well, quite possibly #1.

Example: Place a full page ad on widgetworld.com so the URL is: widgetworld.com/bluewidgets.html

As long as this ad page is not over optimized, then it should do very well in the current state of google. A key reason is: it's not an index page, and it should have very few backlinks...nobody pays for backlinks to their ad page. Your home page may have 200 backlinks, but your ad page would have maybe 1 or 2..and only an internal link from widgetworld.com.

There are about 6 of these ad pages in the top 10 for my niche, while the home pages for these same companies have vanished.

This would explain a lot of the Amazon listings as well.

CORRECTION: all 15 of the top 15 results for a 3 keyword search combo are NOT homepages!

CORRECTION 2: This seems to be true because all of the homepages for my niche are a maximum of PR5...so the pages on worldwigets.com (PR7 for this site) for those companies (wordlwidgets.com/bluewidgets.html) has a higher PR than the home pages of individual company sites...If you want to advertise, forget banners and links.... you need a fully dedicated page on a decent PR site.

vbjaeger

6:35 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Could somebody please explain what the -fufufu-xyzxyz or -dfdf dfdfd means? Is there special signifigance to each letter? I know what they are doing because I can see the different results when they are used. I just dont know what they are.

Thanks in advance

cayenne

6:36 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Is this the beginning of the segregation of commercial vs. non commercial sites?

SOD That's the best theory I've heard yet. G would maintain its quality search characteristics for non-commercial research on the web & also drive more adwords revenue.

Maybe the free ride is over...besides if your business model cannot withstand having to spend a percentage of revenues on advertising, then maybe its not a viable business model to begin with.

If this is what is happening, it's not such a bad thing.

(Don't throw eggs at me now ok?)

-c

Jessica

6:41 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



hey guys, you all talk about soem keywords being filtered, etc. but what about index pages?

i dont think my sites are being filtered - its just that my index pages are gone from the index.

whats going on? is it a bug or what?

europeforvisitors

6:43 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)



Do you see now, that you can write "editorial" content to your hearts content and Google will still drop you into obscurity in a heartbeat?

Well, they dropped three of my pages out of 3,500+ into obscurity in a heartbeat. :-)

Sure, having tons of pages and sites is, and will always be the best insurance for google, but it would be easier if they just returned the proper results.

I certainly wouldn't argue with that. But finding the recipe that delivers optimum search results can't be easy, and collateral damage tends not to be permanent.

I would suggest that Google crank back the setting that gives #1 search rankings to Amazon.com catalog pages. (I'm guessing those pages are ranking high because they're "fresh." If freshness is the main criterion for a #1 ranking, that's a major weakness in the algorithm because it creates an opening for "freshness spam.")

Johnny Foreigner

6:45 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)



Hi all,

We have found, if we call up any short phrase from the index page it comes up #1 or #2, (except if it is included in the title) but the only KW from the title that works is the company name.

Just Guessing

6:59 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hey, Google is logging all these Double Dash keyword searches.

and they are busy implementing a different algo for each keyphrase - just to keep us guessing

GG is laughing so much his hands can't hit the keyboard

and yes, I've been nuked too - very selectively, for non spammy pages but for keyphrases of obvious interest

Kackle

7:01 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)



Could somebody please explain what the -fufufu -xyzxyz or -dfdf dfdfd means? Is there special signifigance to each letter? I know what they are doing because I can see the different results when they are used. I just don't know what they are.

These are nonsense "exclusion" terms. They can be any combination of characters immediately preceded by a hyphen (i.e., a minus sign). If you enter one or more of these in the search box, Google interprets this as meaning that you want all pages that fulfill your search request except pages that contain these terms. If the characters are nonsense, then it means that you are asking Google to exclude something which would not exist on any page to begin with.

There are two thresholds for this "filter" penalty. One is the dictionary lookup for "bad" words or word pairs. Once you hit in the dictionary, there is a second threshold for whether a page in the SERPs is over-optimized on that dictionary hit. Leading suspects for this second threshold are titles, headlines, anchor text, URLs on the page (domain, path, filename), and URL/anchor text in external links to that page. If both thresholds are met, that page tends to drop like a rock in the SERPs for that particular searcher's request.

There is substantial evidence that the dictionary is mostly "money" words or terms. Noncommercial sites have not been affected. There is even speculation that the dictionary is nothing more than Google's list of Adword terms. This would be very controversial, if it is true.

It appears that adding nonsense exclusion terms to a search confuses the dictionary lookup, so that in many cases the lookup fails. If this first threshold (the lookup) fails, the second threshold (the over-optimization) has no keywords to use, so the page is not penalized. In some cases, more than one exclusion term makes a difference. This could mean that depending on how the search box terms are parsed, a douple pass at the dictionary might be done for some searches. Or, just a greater number of terms in the search box tends to exempt you from the dictionary lookup in the first place.

What many have been noticing is that when the penalty is applied, it's like a sniper attack rather than a shotgun blast. Very specific sites drop completely, while others are unaffected. This argues against those who think that there are some new broad matching rules in place rather than the process I just described.

lgn1

7:05 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



When somebody has finally done something to recover from
the Florida Turkey shoot, I suggest they start a new thread,
so it does not get lost in the noise of this very large thread.

bekyed

7:11 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hello Kackle,
When i type in the nonsence term keyword1 keyword2 keyword3 -dfdf-dfdfd my site appears back to the same position before the update.
I am confused am i penalised and what can i do about it kackle? as i am losing lots of money.

Bek

Miop

7:12 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I'd just like to know why, using the main search page, for some searches my old index page appears, while for others, my new one does.

James_Dale

7:19 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



some categories are more up-to-date than others. Some are drawn specifically from certain datacentres, which have not yet cached your new page.

[edited by: James_Dale at 7:21 pm (utc) on Nov. 23, 2003]

davaddavad

7:20 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I have been monitoring this site since before yahoo dropped its own directory in favor of google. It is a small 6 page site that buys "keyword1 keyword2". It was built two + years ago. Normally it is 1-4 out of 245,000. There were about 6-10 competitors in google for buying this material. Last year around this time we all dropped back. This update we are all gone. The first relevant result is my main competitors dmoz listing at 9 I was 10 but still fluctuating. They are an adwords customer we are not. On a postive note I am still getting the same traffic but from msn and the occasional other even my odp and yahoo listings.
See now if google thinks these results are relevant well thats their opinion not mine.

superscript

7:23 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)



Kackle, thanks for the -uygi7ytf explanation. I've just tried it and my commercial site is back on page 1. Deeply disturbing.

You know ladies and gentlemen, I've been living with this stress for two years now, and frankly I've had enough. I'm certainly not paying for Adwords - I've tried them before, spent £4,000 and my sales volume increased by £3000, profit by £1000. £3000 loss.

So I guess it is probably time to pack it all in - I haven't had a single sale for 24 hours.

skipfactor

7:29 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>since before yahoo dropped its own directory in favor of google.

Huh?

vbjaeger

7:31 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thank you Kackle!

lasko

7:32 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>since before yahoo dropped its own directory in favor of google.

Did I miss something?

Thought Yahoo was getting rid of Google :)

Powdork

7:35 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Yahoo used to place its directory matches above the web results, which were/are from Google. This changed last October (approx). Now the Google results are default with a red arrow to denote sites in the directory.

lgn1

7:38 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I just read in another post that googleguy is back home (as in with family) on a 56K modem.

Which may explain why we have not seen him on the Florida post lately. At 56K, it would take a week to read all the Florida posts. You think they would pay googleguy enough to get broadband for his family :)

[edited by: lgn1 at 7:41 pm (utc) on Nov. 23, 2003]

lasko

7:40 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



>>since before yahoo dropped its own directory in favor of google.

I think you mean Yahoo decided to mix the Yahoo directory to the Google search results. Yahoo never dropped its directory for Googles directory, slight typo there.

Anyway still think this update has a long way to go :)

I just read in another post that googleguy is back home on a 56K modem.

The poor guy spends his free time in WW and all he gets is name calling and abuse. Not surprising he's taking a break, specially when he does it out of free will.

[edited by: lasko at 7:42 pm (utc) on Nov. 23, 2003]

superscript

7:41 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)



The Yahoogle results look like a mix of the pre-Florida ecommerce bash Google results, and the current Google results - can anyone shed any light?

davaddavad

7:45 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Yes before google yahoo used its own directory for searches supplimented if I remember correctly by inktomi. Then they dropped their directory in favor of google and I think 10% of google. Now they have acquired their own search properties again. So they will probably be dropping google soon. As yahoo is depending on google for its results and they are now mostly trashy this will have a negative affect on at yahoo and aol and the rest of their partners. However
since the only relevant results left now are the target adwords and overture listings still intact. hth

Crisco

7:48 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)



Anyway still think this update has a long way to go

Yes - there are still some relevant sites that need to filter down in favor of the "amazons" of the world. :(

Run an affiliate oriented site? Not any more!

Johnny Foreigner

7:48 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)



We use a 3 KW as follows:

KW KW KWs dropped out of existance (as good as)

But the following gives #1 slot:

KW KWs KWs

So we know the middle KW is the bad-boy, it just happens to be the one everyone uses to source our service.!

We used it in adwords so yes it is used there.

superscript

7:55 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)



DavadDavad,

I wish Google looked a bit more like Yahoogle does now. It's relevant and not too spammy. Best of all, I'm back on page one! Same with Altavista, but being top of Altavista is like being the best swimmer in the Sahara.

davaddavad

8:01 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



The kewords for my site are that are missing are being used by my competitor's in adwords. hth

Namaste

8:05 pm on Nov 23, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Has the update settled?
This 626 message thread spans 21 pages: 626