Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Google ranking problem

my position droped dramatically dont know why

         

stinky

5:28 am on Aug 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I am new here, and am looking for some help, any input would be appreciated. basically my web site droped dramatically in position in google and yahoo for my good key words and i am trying to figure out if its me or this google bug i am reading about.

-My first Question is, would having a 1 pixel by 1 pixel transparent gif on my web page cause me to get penalized or lower my position on SE such as Google and yahoo?

Example, My page "MainSite"was ranked #8 on first page of google for a keyword and about 5 days later it fell to #32 position. The only thing i changed on my site was:
1.put a 1 pixel by 1 pixel transparent gif link on the bottom of page "MainSite" linking to my site map(i wonted to hide it from competators)
2. I put the same 1 pixel by 1 pixel trasnparent gif on 3 other sites i own that are related, linking back to my "MainSite" index page.

-2nd Question, i also added some numerical page names, would that have caused my dropping in SE position?
Example, lets say my site is targeting key word "keyword"
i named my links /keyword-1.html , keyword-2.html
keyword-3.html etc. Would this have caused the problem.

Any help or input would be very appreciated.

[edited by: Marcia at 5:46 am (utc) on Aug. 8, 2003]

Marcia

5:52 am on Aug 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>to hide it from competators

If it were a penalty enough to get you banned you wouldn't be ranking at all. Remember that if it's at all competitive, especially with a one-word search, your competitors are hard at work trying to gain position, so dropping down wouldn't be unexpected.

It really isn't a good idea to use 1 pixel invisible gifs for links. It's an old trick that's just begging for trouble.

About those links to your site from the others that are now using invisible gifs to link - what were those links like before you made the change?

Dave_Hawley

5:55 am on Aug 8, 2003 (gmt 0)



linking to my site map(i wonted to hide it from competators)

I have to ask....why are you concerned about competitors seeing your site map?

Dave

Umbra

7:30 am on Aug 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Many index pages use a special 1x1 image to track hits via a (3rd party) web statistics site. Since Google can't tell the difference, they shouldn't be penalizing sites with a tiny GIF.

Marcia

8:25 am on Aug 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



It really doesn't sound like a penalty, just what's a normal rankings drop for nowadays. No, there's no problem with the gifs in affiliate links but that would pass a hand check. Not the same thing as hidden links, it might be worth thinking twice about it.

What I was wondering was if the links from the other sites that are now gifs were previously links using anchor text.

richardb

8:53 am on Aug 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Google does not mind 1 * 1 gifs and as long as you ain't doing anything "dodgy" don't worry.

If you are in any doubt go to http*//www.bugnosis.org/

Neat little tool which will show you how many sites use 1 * 1 gifs... … for tracking purposes!

Hell, you can get paranoid and ask Brett about WW and the dodgy dealings with [showcase.netins.net...] - campanology? ;)

Rich

claus

9:20 am on Aug 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



stinky, welcome to WebmasterWorld :)

- all major sites in Denmark, Sweden, and Norway use 1x1 px gifs - this is done to track traffic, but i can assure you that the use of the gif is no problem with Google or any other SE.

The "competitors <> site map" thing: I don't understand - the reason for providing a site map for the SE's is to get all your pages indexed. As you are doing this, your pages will be found in the search engines anyway, so why hide it?

richardb: campanology? That's bell ringing?

/claus

richardb

1:15 pm on Aug 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



/claus: Yeap ;)

Rich

g1smd

7:46 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>> Many index pages use a special 1x1 image to track hits via a (3rd party) web statistics site. Since Google can't tell the difference, they shouldn't be penalizing sites with a tiny GIF. <<

Of course they know the difference!

I'd expect that their software has a simple way to class sites as link farms, counter/tracking sites, advert pop-up and banner sites, and so on, and exclude them from the listings.

crazytees

8:17 pm on Aug 10, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Probably a stupid question but... Does Google see hotspots and rollovers as links too or just text links and images? I am currently rebuilding my site from a frame site to pages and I am trying to rank better but it's tough in my keywords. Thanks

samwise

5:00 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi Stinky

Get some deodorant ;)

1.put a 1 pixel by 1 pixel transparent gif link on the bottom of page "MainSite" linking to my site map(i wonted to hide it from competators)

Anyone can crawl your site or download it completely if they wanted. There are a number of shareware programs that can do such a thing.

2 cents

Radiolabs

10:19 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Ok, so perhaps you have a spacer image in your website. The spacer image is a 1 X (width) image file that is very standard. It is used for autostretching webpages. This is almost mandatory on alot of sites so Google couldn't penalize for it..... Actually, autostretching a single 1px X px image is used also for wallpaper graphics and alot of things.

Come to think of it, if I have about 5 spacer images in my site, I could use "ALT" image files on all of them too and probably end up with better ranking.

Does anyone think that google would penalize for ALT image tags on spacers? Target all of them for different keywords. Might help with SEO a little.

Any opinions?

[/Radiolabs]

ScottM

10:23 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Does anyone think that google would penalize for ALT image tags on spacers

Penalize? Not that I'm aware of. Ignore? Quite possible.

MikeNoLastName

10:36 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I can't guarantee it is not just coincidence, but about 9 months ago a client of mine said he heard somewhere that "linking to really good sites could increase your own ranking". So, taking it literally, he took it upon himself to put about 20 invisible 1 pixel links at the bottom of his home page to all the major search engines and to about a dozen of his highest ranked competitors.
Google didn't seem to care much, all other things being equal, but within a month his many-year-old, well ranked home page was totally G-O-N-E from Yahoo (and still is even after removing them) while many of his subpages are still there.

Mike

g1smd

10:59 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



>> The spacer image is a 1 X (width) image file that is very standard. It is used for autostretching webpages. This is almost mandatory on alot of sites so Google couldn't penalize for it. <<

No problem with an image on its own. The problem might appear if that image is made into a clickable link to some other page or site.

Radiolabs

11:18 pm on Aug 13, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Well, that's all bad news! Glad I didn't just throw it up there and see what happens. I don't think I would put links on the images, just use them for ALT tag place holders.

I might try it out on another site that is not that important and see what happens. If it works, I'll let everyone know. Everyone's got to have one of those disposable sites!

stinky

10:46 pm on Aug 15, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Thanks everybody for the input. Just some more info, the 1 x 1 pix links I put on my other 3 sites that all linked back to my "mainsite" are all hosted at the same hosting company. Somebody mentioned to me that this might have been a reason for my positioning to fall, because there all on the same IP. Maybe google gave my site less relevance to those keywords I was trying to get, but my site still ranks high if I type the "keyword" in a 3 word frais. Interesting, but I will keep you guys posted if I figure it out.
Thanks again.

Ecmast

5:21 am on Aug 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



--i also added some numerical page names, would that have caused my dropping in SE position?--

IMO the problem could lie here.

If you renamed files Google will need to spider them. Probably not all renamed pages have been spidered yet. If this is the case, it's only a matter of time before you make to your old position again.

sit2510

12:18 pm on Aug 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Hi Stinky,

I would give highest weight to 1x1 pixel links that cause your ranking to drop. Google does not penalize the whole site for 1x1 pixel links, but downgrade any the relevant keywords that it used to give to that page. That is why your PR may not be affected, but your ranks just drop dramatically - eg. from page 1 to page 10 or more.

The story of same IP address, numerical page names and 1 pixel gif are NOT the cause of your problem.

The earliest incidence that I believe Google had applied this 1 pixel link filter is around the time of Dominic or a little after, but I could be wrong...After you remove these 1 pixel links, it could take you around 1 month to have your rank restored.

stinky

3:30 pm on Aug 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



A lot of those numerical page names that I added have text that repeats on each page, not all of the text repeats, but the same two paragraphs at the bottom of the each page does, which is a site summary using targeted keywords. Each page is composed of 3 paragraphs, so only the first one is different 2nd two paragraphs are the same.
Could that have something to do with google dropping my position?

I removed the 1 x 1 invisible pix from the other 3 sites and will let everyone know if it made a difference.

Also, what does "IMO" stand for.
Thanks

g1smd

9:55 pm on Aug 16, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



In My Opinion

I have never like 1-pixel spacers. They always seemed like a code-bloat badly thought out kludge, used in place of more logical code. Now that CSS is well supported they can all be removed.

sourav

4:31 am on Aug 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



One question :

If I use one character link ( e.g. : "Tot<a style="text-decoration:none" href="abc.html">a</a>l") other then 1x1 pixel, is it ok for google or it is spam?

g1smd

9:45 pm on Aug 18, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



At the bottom of a Google search results page have you seen what the individual letters of G o o o o o g l e actually link to?