Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.198.87.238

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

-fi or -sj

Is fi a version of sj without dicey results filters?

     
5:39 pm on May 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Take a look at fi. It has more sites in each search than sj - does anyone think it is an unfiltered (for spam,etc) version of sj?
5:43 pm on May 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



No.

All spam on deck on both for me.

5:50 pm on May 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



for what I am watching it looks like that
5:54 pm on May 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Would someone mind defining spam... in their opinion of course.

Thanks

6:00 pm on May 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



results a user would consider irrelevant when typing in keywords -
as always there is wide room for interpretation
6:05 pm on May 8, 2003 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member rfgdxm1 is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



>results a user would consider irrelevant when typing in keywords -
as always there is wide room for interpretation

Actually, in this context "spam" usually means either the same person having multiple listings with different domains high up in the SERPs by using different domains, or extremely minor but relevant sites dominating over more established ones. This seems a lot more of a practical problem than irrelevant results, such as lots of porn sites coming up on some innocuous search like "purple penguins".

 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month