Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 107.22.55.73

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

HTTP Fingerprinting by SEs?

     
6:56 pm on Apr 12, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 26, 2004
posts:63
votes: 0


Not directly related to cloaking, but probaly the most relevant forum for this discussion..

Trying to determine whether placing two well ranked sites, for similar products, on the same server (due to administration simplicity and use separate DNS zones on different (one using an external DNS service) name servers and IPs in two different class B's, -OR- simply to host one site "off-site" so-to-speak on a different ISP?

The main consideration is whether the SEs would penalize competing sites for collusion if they were simply behind the same core router or if it takes same subnet, or even same machine..?

Obviously this is all speculation, but does anyone have an opinion whether HTTP finger printing to determine sites hosted on the same box have ever been (or likely to be?) an issue from an SEO perspective?

See [net-square.com...] for reference..

5:43 pm on Apr 13, 2006 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 22, 2001
posts:2450
votes: 0


separate DNS zones on different (one using an external DNS service) name servers and IPs in two different class B's,

I think you'll be OK with this strategy. One thing to keep in mind in addition to the above is the whois info for your domains. You want that to be different, too.

About the only way the engines will be able to tell the sites are related is through links (duh) and that the IP addresses (even different Class Bs) are registered to the same company/person. If you go through a large host, though, there should be no problem with that.

6:08 pm on Apr 13, 2006 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Jan 26, 2004
posts:63
votes: 0


yeah. definitely had planned to keep whois different and make sure that IPs were from different class B's and owned by separate entities..

just nice to get some reaffirmation that the approach is sound :-) thx.