Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 54.234.244.30

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Nice Article on Cloaking

     
3:16 pm on Sep 16, 2001 (gmt 0)

Administrator from US 

WebmasterWorld Administrator brett_tabke is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month

joined:Sept 21, 1999
posts:38048
votes: 12


Nice article by Greg Boser titled To Cloak or Not To Cloak? [searchenginewatch.com] over at Search Engine Watch.
3:42 pm on Sept 16, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member macguru is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Dec 30, 2000
posts:3300
votes: 0


Thant you Brett, nice one indeed.

On this issue, I have to admitt I never used any cloaking script else from experiments on test sites that I play with.

I kind of agree with Mikkel Demib Svendsen:

Mikkel presented the opinion that search engines should focus their efforts on detecting and eliminating spam, regardless of the methods used to deliver it.

I is not what you use, it is how you use it.

I was kind of tempted to offer the cloaking solution for a huge JSP/JS links site. Someday, I will purchase one of those scripts that offer a good update program.

But I will always resist the temptation to SPAM with it.

Air

7:04 pm on Sept 16, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 10, 2000
posts:1253
votes: 0


Yeah, Greg did a nice job on it. Very news like reporting, I believe Alan Perkins posted here for a while, I seem to recall a pretty spirited discussion in this very cloaking forum with Alan, Mikkel, and many others. Those same participants had expressed the same points of view they apparantly still hold.
11:37 am on Sept 17, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 8, 2000
posts:700
votes: 0


Cloaking, our version of religion and politics. I would like to have heard exactly what was said at the conference.
5:00 pm on Sept 21, 2001 (gmt 0)

Junior Member

10+ Year Member

joined:Feb 14, 2001
posts:129
votes: 0


The article was a great read, not that it really answered many questions, but it does bring focus to an already hot topic.

Spam is spam, regardless of the source! We cannot ban techniques simply because they are abused by spammers!~ If we ban all the methods spammers use, then we would also have to include JavaScript, frames, layers, and many other site enhancing techniques.

The focus must be on tracking down the spammers, banning their sites and possibly the hosts which serve them as well as their authors!~

11:40 pm on Sept 21, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member

joined:June 26, 2000
posts:2176
votes: 0


>>Yeah, Greg did a nice job on it. Very news like reporting

Thank you. :) I can't begin to tell you how difficult the whole "objective journalist" thing really is. When Chris asked me to cover a couple of sessions, It sounded like a fairly easy task. When I actually sat down to do it, I learned how much different that type of writing really is.

A reporter, I am not. My hat's off to those who do it regularly.

>>I would like to have heard exactly what was said at the conference.

There really wasn't anything that hasn't been covered at length here. What was interesting, was who was attending the cloaking discussions. Some pretty high-profile names were printed on many of the badges. (No, I'm not going to give names)

It appeared, based on the types of questions, and who was asking them that despite all the search engine chest pounding, personalized content delivery fo45 search engines is gaining popularity.

11:59 pm on Sept 22, 2001 (gmt 0)

Senior Member

WebmasterWorld Senior Member agerhart is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member

joined:Mar 29, 2001
posts:2945
votes: 0


Very nice article WebGuerrilla!
 

Join The Conversation

Moderators and Top Contributors

Hot Threads This Week

Featured Threads

Free SEO Tools

Hire Expert Members