Forum Moderators: martinibuster
2. List yourself on all global, local, and topic specific directories. More the better if legit sites.
3. Make sure all pages/sites which link to you do not participate on the above mentioned programs. btw, this includes your own pages.
4. Keep wishing for a middleman site which could do 'all of the above' for you.
Unfortunately, for most website owners links exchange boils down to applying once and then forget about reciprocal links all together, that is if they so much as know what we are talking about.
I have no input in this particular site but the webmaster is a friendly chap and I have received his newsletter for the past two years.
Anybody interested, I can sticky the url
Not sure what you mean. All we were talking about was a straight forward directory ( it could look just like dmoz or any of the others ) The only real difference is that ....
a.... The sites listed would be actively looking for link partners.
b... That they would include an email address ( in some form ) for people to request link exchanges from.
No automation of any kind - No rules forcing links or exclusivity -
NOT A LINK FARM OF ANY DESCRIPTION.
Just a "meeting place" as Johnnydequino was looking for.
It would need funding of course. Maybe a one off listing fee in US$ single figure.
I am seriously tempted.
categories could be things like:
- reciprocal
- PR
- - below 3
- - greater then 3
- - greater then 4
- - greater then 5
- - greater then 6
- - greater then 7
- one-way theme based only
- front-page link only
- deep-link/product-link
And so on, and you could find pages that suit your desired type of link.
I'm still up for it for the technical side.
SN
The more organized any exchange scheme looks, the more likely it is to draw negative attention.
I personally think Google will have to move beyond its current algorithm - between PR sales, outsourced link campaigns, and more subtle forms of link farming, the predictive value of links and their text will certainly decline.
Something like:
-free service, but requires login to keep obscured from public
-no marketing on the site ( may run something like Adsense ), but keep free from any bias
-category based directory, PR will not be any option on this site.
-on site message system for contact between users, similar to StickyMail here
-multi-field entry into a database for code to be placed on page linking to you
-advanced entry box for code to accept html, scripting, styles, etc.
-no automation, the service displays code from db, entered by userA, to be copied an moved by userB manually to his system
-trade agreements are between users, but must follow certain rules
-moderated, continued or unresolved violations of rules gets ya booted
-feedback, rating, complaint system
-options such as email alerts of potential trade partners, coice of contact, multiple links and code
-anonymity and privacy options, as hiding your domain from users until agreement reached if needed
-information section for articles, news, faq, instructions, help, etc. (input welcome)
If there is enough interest I'll do it just to satisfy my curiosity, sticky me.
... this topic should be moved off WebmasterWorld though!
Exactamundo. And I wonder what percentage the above mentioned activity represents of the total linking done on the net...1%?...more?
Any thoughts anyone on this approach?
But I would seriously NOT want any reference to Google PR on site... and certainly not 'ordered by' or search by PR.
Whether money was changing hands or not, that just screams "penalise me".
...that just screams "penalise me"
Not many people are going to pay to sign up.
Maybe not, but does it need many people - a couple of hundred or so? Also a bit like here - those that want something for nothing don't always get it and if you anti up you get what you pay for.
..there already exists a forum which does this work for free
Kind of but it is full of spam, is very badly organised, unmoderated and consequently not really used (if it is the same one as I am thinking of). I was thinking of something more professional and for the professional.
Anyway it is just an idea worth talking through at the moment! More than likely it wont fly :)