Cloaking Preference

Which technique provides best results?

[fashezee]

On the cloak page; what produces the best results;

1)keywords
2)keywords + text
3)keywords as links + text
4)keywords as links
5)all the above
6)none of the above

[jeremy goodrich]

Are we talking randomly generated garbage?

Or 'real pages'...?

The cloaked version -> which goes to the bots - should have *everything* on it that you believe, right or wong, that will make it rank well.

I've seen some that were pure links, some that were 10 words and 3 links, etc.

Whatever you think will work for you, test, analyze, and test again. :)

[jdancing]

Does anyone have suggestions on a program that will generate effect key phrase pages. Random garbage is somewhat acceptable if search engine friendly.

I tried trial versions of Webposition Gold create a key word page with about 3 words in it and Spyderopts made a very weak attempt to make keyword pages from my existing pages. I have lots of layers and JavaScript and these programs don't seem to be able to deal with it.

It seems they like to deal with pure HTML pages. If that’s the case, I my as well do it myself. I am new at this so please excuse my ignorance.

[johnser]

Do a DIY job & use IP Delivery cloaking.
Much better results than the automated stuff

[johnser]

To clarify above...

I always use at least a full page of comprehensible optimised text per phrase which includes from SEO view:

<title>
<h1>
<desc>
<bold>
phrase in first line of paragraph
lots of link text

I also use IP delivery. (Search Google for "John Heard IP")
Its simple & good.

Don't try & automate the generation of cloaked pages.
If I was GoogleGuy, I'd ban you for that. Theres no reason I've come across to use this (other than for porn spam!)

Manually prepared text for cloaking is of course slower but infinitely preferable.

X