Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

A badly cloaked doorway example.

         

Brett_Tabke

5:24 am on Jul 25, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



If you ever wanted an example of how not to do cloaking, look here [wallpaper-4u.com]. Then walk back to the root. However, that page is ranked in the top 100 under many related keywords on Fast.

Air

7:57 am on Jul 25, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



The title on his cloaked page is too funny - lol

Brett_Tabke

9:25 am on Jul 25, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Look at the alt tags to see who's handy work that is...

NFFC

9:42 am on Jul 25, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



And a search on the alt tag at Google produces this. [google.com]:)


Added And I never noticed this before:

"In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 69 already displayed.
If you would like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included"

oilman

1:45 pm on Jul 25, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I've come across these monkeys before as well - got a good laugh then and had another now.

That particular page is obviously for lycos - you can keep changing the last bit just before the .html and see all the different ways they changed it up for the different SEs (av, hb, and ink all have pages as well)

What's with all the hyphenation in the key words though?

Air

3:08 pm on Jul 25, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Just had a look at the alt tags - can't say I'm surprised.

You know what's funny though, think of all the posts you've all seen where people say they can't get indexed, or they are concerned about having 5 repetitions of a keyword then go look at that page again ...

jaz

2:47 pm on Jul 26, 2000 (gmt 0)



Are these guys actually cloaking by identifying ip address and delivering a unique page upfront or just using links on another page to point to all of their optimized files. Then using the robots.txt file to allow each engine to see only the page that its supposed to?

Has anyone used the robot.txt file in this way?

oilman

2:54 pm on Jul 26, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I would assume that they are using some type of IP/UA cloaking. Robots.txt is just too unreliable - too many spiders simply ignore it entirely.

Brett_Tabke

11:10 pm on Jul 27, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Tell you the truth, I think it is just a broken system, or they really aren't cloaking at all. Why you'd put up doorway pages like that and not cloak them...

Air

3:58 am on Jul 28, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Here's another bad example -

but you've got to be fast on the "stop" button, just hit refresh then quickly hit stop. Don't know what kind of cloaking system this is but not good.

[paint.tierranet.com ]

PeteU

4:43 am on Jul 28, 2000 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Air, its just a simple doorway with some hidden text, no cloaking there, and no redirect .. or am I missing something?

Air

5:31 am on Jul 28, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I think you're missing something Pete. There are two pages, but you've got to be quick on the draw with the stop button.

I couldn't post the URL to the two pages 'cause it's the same for both. :)

[added] ok now you're making me think, I see one page with a black background and white text and no graphics when quick on the stop button, and then I see the doorway with the same gibberish but as hidden text if I just let the page load. Is that what you saw?[/added]

PeteU

6:03 am on Jul 28, 2000 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Air, its an old trick, a page with black background and white text using a small white gif as background image thus covering all white text. No wonder you couldn't stop it, heh, its just the background image loading delay ;)

Air

7:14 am on Jul 28, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



yeah, that's why I added the second part, you got me thinking about it. Usually with that trick you can't see it happening, thought I had found a really badly cloaked one - but alas you are right :)

NFFC

12:42 pm on Jul 30, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Downloaded a little program that allows me to change the UA in IE. Changed it and went here [statewidecars.8l.com] and found a cloaked domain.

Are these guys amateurs or was I just lucky.

Air

3:25 pm on Jul 30, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



NFFC,

go have a look now ...

NFFC

3:51 pm on Jul 30, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Sorry Air can't see any difference, but I am a bit thick!

Air

4:10 pm on Jul 30, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



oh, when I went to have a look it 404'd, so I assumed they took it down.

Q

8:47 pm on Jul 30, 2000 (gmt 0)



Definitely cloaking. Amateurs?--Not neccesarily, definitely careless though--it looks to me like they are using a combination-serving some pages by IP and some by User agent.

jaz

2:49 pm on Jul 31, 2000 (gmt 0)



NFFC,

Where did you get the software to change your user agent??

WebGuerrilla

4:28 pm on Aug 8, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Here is a link to a program that will allow you to change your User Agent [filemine.com ]

Brett_Tabke

6:07 am on Aug 9, 2000 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Hey WG, thanks for dialing us up.

Agent names can also be changed with many banner busters like Junkbusters or Webwasher.