Forum Moderators: open
The first couple of pages of results have
reasonable quality. The folders are a little kooky (click "Showall" to see all the weird ones). The "Expert's Links" section is the most interesting feature IMHO --- they separate the pages with lots of links from "content" pages. The link pages they return aren't half-bad.
A few tests show they don't have as many pages as google though.
Btw, I'm sure we all would be interested if the minds behind teoma or any of the search engine related CS work paid us an official visit. :)
re: The Engine
Looks very interesting. I'd be curious about it's coverage.
Relevance is pretty good.
Don't care for the expert links.
Don't care for the attempt to hide the url (the most important bit of information per listing).
Phrase match should be the default.
Need some work on the dupe checker [teoma.com].
Speed is excellent. (which makes me wonder about converage/docs indexed)
Good luck.
Press release [google.com]
Also interesting in that it was developed with Rutgers University. *cough* we do have modern logs here...lol
They've hit domains only registered, without any content, within days of their being registered. Which is what led me to this conclusion, but I could be wrong.
Their results page is interesting...I'm wondering if anybody will "break the new mold" ala the google style home page.
What gets me about Teoma and Wisenut, is value proposition what is it? For the consumer? I've got google, what else am I missing?
If the "new kid on the block" can't get past my google fixation, I'm not buying it. And I don't see how they do...or am I missing something?