Forum Moderators: open
"If users knew the first few results were paid listings on most search engines, would they still click on the link?"
You have to think about the question this raises, are ethics thrown out the window under the premise of "if they don't know, and we can make money why not charge..."
Most of the people outside of our industry are amazed when I show them all of the paid listings they encounter, and most of them feel tricked. "how is this possible" they say....well if your a search engine anything's possible when you run out of options.
I think PPC is the future of SE's, but I also feel it needs either guidelines or control...something mandated either way. Soon it will get out of hand and I know, if I have to compete with SEO related keywords going for $10.00 a click I'm going to start selling dustpans.
The rest of the sales world operates on paid advertising. Whether we like it or not, that is the model (the only model) that seems to be generating cash on the web. How long can companies stay in business offering "free" search listings?
I guess my point is, users don't care if a listing is paid or not (arguable :)). And if they do care if it is paid, they better get used to it, because for better or worse, more and more SERPs have a price tag behind them.
I would prefer to get visitors for free, and find listings that are not paid for. But how long can that continue? Others here, like Google Guy and Alex182, know a lot more about the economics of search engines than I do. But I could not stay in business long providing my product for free. Hopefuly, we can all keep selling our current products for a reasonable cost per click and stay out of the dustpan business :)
Don
I know I don't have all of the answers and others are going to have better insight on this subject, but this directly affects me and nearly everyone in this field that Pay's per click.
As far as not clicking on advertisement, well, if I was a buyer/prospect, rather than a searcher, would I click on an ad?.. heck yeah.
If I want to send someone flowers, and type in flowers, I don't want a content rich site on the history of horticulture, or gardening or arranging. I couldn't care less if an advertiser pays to get my attention or not, as long as his site satisfies my need to buy flowers.
Paid listings, when indicated as such, may even aid the info searcher in avoiding commercial sites. Searching is an iterative process.
And as a seller, who would I prefer to click? The buyer/real prospect of course. Not the info seeker. Thats the real difference between conventional advertising and the web IMHO.
I am also of the opinion that the web, and ecommerce is not immune to natural selection. Banners suffered a near total death, until the smart learned how to use them correctly. Businesses that find themselves overbidding will migrate away from PPC. And PPC bids will actually find a reasonable market value for themselves.
Or, I will also be selling dustpans. Offline.
Good point with the "content" arguement. Sure if you're savvy enough to know the difference between paid and free and have also made the decision you don't want to read content than that's great, but still most of the people I talk to didn't even realize paid listings existed...this has to count for something. People are misinformed, and much like a monopoly the search engines control where you go, and undoubtedly the content rich site will lose out on most search engines, the big and slick sites with nothing to say and everything sell will win.
Maybe dustpans would sell ok.
Yep, that's the future of PPC. Problem is a big corp can bid more because they not only factor in the revenue of the immediate sale but also branding & long term market share. Think of the x box case. They can overpay just to make sure you can't get in, an can also afford loosing money for a while in a given sector to kill competition and raise the price later when everybody else is dead.
Meanwhile, small & quick and grab a niche that the big guys did not found yet.