Forum Moderators: open
shhheeeesshh! talk about making up for acquisition costs!
Now...in a new PPC market (ie, korea), I assume reaching critical mass is an important factor....and I imagine that this is going to slow the pace (especially with competitive PPC, Zingu, offering free sign-up)..regardless of having major affiliates.
Obviously, they think that's the sweet spot between fast adoption and making up for the minimum-guaranteed-revenue deals they made with Daum and MSN and dreamwiz--which unofficially probably totaling at least $15million in guarantees. BUT STILLL! I know I stopped to rethink testing it out when it came down to the initial payment.
Don't know how that will play into Google's eventual Korea AdWords launch and the famous Korean nationism (ala Zingu.com) and rapid "me-too" competitive website implementation (ala Naver and Daum crush YahooKorea).
Did they start out like that in Japan?
I really hope that doesn't apply to ppl with current accounts in other countries.
Agree it would seem sensible for OV as a new entrant to come in at a lower or at least same price (with more advantages) than existing market players. Maybe they are betting on their global brand name, but as you know in Korea, that usually does not count as it may do in other countries. I hear Koreans have more distrust of foreign brands than other markets, so OV MAY be making a fundamental mistake in that market.
How do OV's rates and ROI compare to their competitors in Korea?
only one PPC competitor in Korea to OV, Zingu (www.zingu.com).....
Zingu: rates are 50won minimum bid for Zingu (about 4cents)
OV: rates are 200won minimum bid for OV (about 16cents)
Zingu: Free 25,000won first time sign-up. (aobut $20)
No monthly minimum and 5000won "refill" minimum to account.
OV: 200,000won first time sign-up (about $180). don't know about monthly minimums or refill.
I don't think ROI is comparable as of yet, since Zingu is fairly new and OV launched like 3 days ago. (I couldn't find a single bidded result on OV)
Maybe they are betting on their global brand name, but as you know in Korea, that usually does not count as it may do in other countries. I hear Koreans have more distrust of foreign brands than other markets, so OV MAY be making a fundamental mistake in that market
Some may disregard this...but I would NOT underestimate this factor...especially with recent tensions with the US. There many many examples of this directly effecting foreign business success here.
I think that by the time Overture made it to Asia their thinking was not to attract the webmaster masses with $0.01 clicks, but rather to target corporate advertising accounts
Also, Japan is expensive even to Koreans. So I can not speak as to whether their values are compariable.
I still say OV was somewhat forced into a high price situation because of the huge debt they entered into the Korea market with (as I said, OV promised about $15 million *!*--at least--in guarantees to its affiliates). Yes, OV can afford that in an overall sense...but OV expansion strategy still has to pull its weight.
And their are still a bunch of Portals in Korea not on that OV list (and they've had 8 months to try to close those deal).....
hmmmmmmm....
The price that Overture set for minimum bids in Japan I think is fair considering the market. I actually expected them to come in a lot higher.
The traditional channels are well established and difficult to break into. Ad agencies have a lot of existing clientele here and they seem to be pushing PPC a lot more than SEO. PPC falls in line closer to traditional advertising. It requires little or no technology to implement and appears to be a good match for the ad agency set.