Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Guerilla Warfare on Overture with Auto Max Bid

         

born2drv

7:37 am on Sep 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



I can't believe people are so stupid. In one very niche search, I got one idiot bidding $1.00/click for his auto-max bid. No one else is bidding on the term, so I got my auto-bid-PPC software setup for "guerilla warfare" mode (autobidder strategy) and I keep bidding $0.99 or 0.01 less than him making him pay the full $1.00/click while I get clicks for $0.05 :)

I wonder how long it will be until he catches on. Even when he does, I got it checking the bids once every minute, and now we get 20 bid changes/day (right?) ....so I don't think he'll bother making 20 x 10 search terms = 200 changes per day to keep up with me. Hehehe....

I'm kinda glad we got the overture auto-bid, combined with a third party auto-bid software, making my bids in a sense auto-auto-bid, it makes for interesting strategies to bankrupt your competition before they even catch on. ;) Hopefully you can get them to drop out altogether or drop their bids rather than participate in rediculuous bid wars.

lgn

11:48 am on Sep 16, 2002 (gmt 0)



The vast majority of companies do not use autobidders, or have a clue about ROI in relation to PPC search engines.

Many people have the mentality that every click is a customer. In reality the industry average is only 1.8 clicks of every 100 is a customer.

This company has most likely set its bid at #1, and it will stay there until, they blow their budget, and may never check their listing again until they run out of funds.

By placing your bid at 99 cents, you are risking that some idiot will bid $1.01, using the going with the herd (over the cliff) mentality.

Mike_Mackin

11:56 am on Sep 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>In reality the industry average is only 1.8 clicks of every 100 is a customer.

Are you referring to a specific industry?

Can you tell us your source?

lgn

3:17 pm on Sep 16, 2002 (gmt 0)



The 1.8% Conversion rate in the above post, is for retail goods sold over the internet. It was from a 2000 survey by the Boston Consulting Group.

I have heard that highly branded sites such as Amazon.com does better, in the 5 - 7% Conversion rate. Can't remember the source for this however.

tjcali

5:23 pm on Sep 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Ign is quite correct on the conversion averages though the 1.8 average may have lowered a bit since 2000. For some products and services, conversions goes above 10%. Typically these higher conversions account for return customers such as in the Amazon case. If your conversion is 1% considering a sale and not a registration or download, you are doing awesome. You also need to account that it's not always an actual user that comes to your site but a machine, spider etc., in some cases on larger and smaller sites that can be as high as 50% or more loads at certain times.

bigjohnt

10:58 pm on Sep 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Conversion ratios are extremely liquid, and relate directly to the subjectivity of relevance, based on how they got there. Any blanket statements are really counterproductive, IMHO. For example, I have a client that got over 5,000 supposedly "targeted" visitors from another vendor, and not one sale. Each visitor stayed on site less than 60 seconds. His conversion for that particular traffic was absolute zero.

My traffic for that client converts at approximately 6%. So much less traffic, but conversion is great. Add the traffic together, and the CR is still rather dismal.

I would avoid using any CR info for anything other than comparison of campaigns- on a per product/keyphrase basis. There are just too many variables to be meaningful. And even an industry-wide examination cannot possibly extract and refine all the variables.

For example, do ALL of Amazon's book choices convert at the same rates? Or are there higher CR's for more specific topics? Or are CR's based on the reviews provided - or nice cover shots? Or the rarity of the book, or do searches for NYT bestsellers convert better than searches for topical reference books?
There's got to be a huge amount of data crunching to make any useful sense of CR data.

PS brn2drv, If you are not careful, that $1 bidder could drop his bid to .98 and guess who gets the shaft then? This tactic used to be called "kneecapping" but now OV makes it easy.

Nieder3d

11:41 pm on Sep 16, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



I agree. Lots of numbers to crunch. And most do not know how to do this effectivly. Really they are wasting a lot of time on Overture with these bidding wars. Especially on the big keywords.

What I think is really funny is when someone bids huge words, and when you go to their site it looks like a Monkey created it. Yeah buddy! watch the conversion fly with that 12 dollar keyword and an unprofessional site... but hey, at least your above your competition.

powerstar

12:13 am on Sep 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Wow Born2Drv, What are you trying to prove. How smart you are? How well you are doing? what's your point?

Why don't you try to make money and not just ruin somebody else campaign.

lgn

2:51 am on Sep 17, 2002 (gmt 0)



I think Born2Drv point is to put incompetent business people out of business.

Buisness like the jungle, is survival of the fittest. Do something stupid and expect to get eaten.

littleman

5:07 am on Sep 17, 2002 (gmt 0)



Powerstar, let's keep this from going personal. Born2drv is enlightening some people of the perils of auto-bidding. If he is hurting this one guy he is helping a hundred more by giving them an education here.

born2drv

2:21 pm on Sep 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Sorry if I offended anyone. I just find it incredibly rediculous how some people run their bidding campaigns.

Like I said, I am happy Overture made this move. Before the strategy with the bidding wars was that you had to keep outbidding your competitor as quickly as possible, and everyone was trying to pay a penny more than everyone else, and everyone ended up paying a higher click rate. Now you can more or less "force" your competitor to lower their max bid, or pay a penalty.

hannamyluv

8:02 pm on Sep 17, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Really, when it comes down to it, #1 spot isn't always the top spot anyway. I have often wondered about how the dingbat who bids $2.00 for the top spot makes any money if they aren't paying attention to the fact that #2 has a max of $1.99 (and may only be paying .20 for their clicks). We have a set bid we pay and if I can't get to the top on that bid, then it's just not worth it to me to go higher. I will just loes money. We make plenty of sales (and profit) on our stuff just being in the #2, 3 or 4 position. :)

lgn

11:55 pm on Sep 17, 2002 (gmt 0)



Actually if you have good ad copy, I find that
their is very little differnce between #1 & #2.
#3 is a close third, as not all Overture partners
display the third position (or place the third
position at the bottom of the page).

powerstar

2:51 am on Sep 18, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



No disrespect littleman, but what if it was your money that he is trying to "educate" everyone with?

I just don't understand and if he wants to show everybody about the autobidding, hey great he can do without ruining this guy's business.

But then again maybe it's just me and I don't see it.

born2drv

4:34 am on Sep 18, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Powerstar, if this guy set his auto-bid to $1.00, then he agreed to pay up to one dollar per click for the traffic. I have done nothing wrong, except to make him pay what he agreed to pay. He has, of course, reduced it and now we all live in peace and harmony :)

born2drv

4:41 am on Sep 18, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



hannamyluv,

I know there is little difference between #1 and #2, but for $0.05 vs $0.06 or $0.07 for traffic I'm willing to pay $0.30+ for, I'd rather be #1.

When you say #4 gets you good traffic, is it close to #3? I would think it was a lot less? Or are you saying #4 is as "good" as #3 when you factor in ROI?

tedster

7:56 am on Sep 18, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



#4 is pretty good traffic for me - mostly from Yahoo and Oingo. Yahoo shows #4 and #5 at the end of the page. Interesting to me is that position #5 gets slightly better traffic than #4.

However, there is a significant droppoff in total clicks from #3 to #4. But the lower traffic is offset a good bit by the fact that positions 4 and 5 have much better conversions. My assumption is that this searcher who is down at the bottom of the page (actually the 24th and 25th lisiting) is a very serious customer.

So right now I aim for #2 or #3 unless the cost is too rich for my budget. Then I prefer #5.

hannamyluv

12:33 pm on Sep 18, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



As far as if it were me (and my money) he was educating with his tactics, he wouldn't. I know better. I've used that tatic on a few ads. Normally, only if I need to "bully" my way into the top few spots. If someone wants to be #1 and bids themselves up high to be there, I will make them pay for it and normally they will drop out or down because of their ROI dropping so then I can get the spot I want at a resonable price. It is a basic fact of business that you need to undercut the competition. Only in normal business you see who can go the lowest before going bust and in CPC it is who can go the highest and not go bust.

As far as ranking goes, in my experience 1 & 2 do the best, of course but 3 is still pretty good and you aren't hurt by too much at 4 when you consider that you will still get orders and you are paying less for what should be the more serious customers. If they get to 4 and click they are price shopping and not just curious. I try to keep it at 4 or more but I may try 5 now that I have read this string.

omegadm

6:08 pm on Sep 18, 2002 (gmt 0)

10+ Year Member



Some info on conversion rates...

We manage a site for a car hire company whose purpose it to get people to book their holiday car hire - payment up front.

Overall the #bookings/#visitors ~ 2.7%
This is real visitors and excludes robots, our own and the client's access.

On OvertureUK, if we are within the top3 listings the client receives ~10-20% of the estimated traffic (Search Term Suggestion Tool)

HTH.