Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Spam the Hades Out of Yahoo

         

JamesR

6:09 pm on Mar 4, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



On one serp (15 results), 4 listings are from the same company, 3 from the same domain. WHOIS lookup easily matches the sites, design does also. Yahoo does not do WHOIS lookups aparently.

How did this company pull it off? The domains are directories with different software products that they affiliate with, passing them off as their own, each having its own listing in the directory. On the bottom of each of these pages, they have a line like (Software Product A Inc.), on the next product page (Software Product B Inc.), spoofing the editors to believe they are the developers.

Shows that the editors do very cursory checks and then admit the content. Hopefully they will figure out how lax their spam checks are. Until then, there is a gaping hole to allow multiple pages from the same site. Any more examples of prolific spam in Yahoo? (no urls please, only methods being used to get in)

Brett_Tabke

11:15 pm on Mar 5, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator 10+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Cash talks. I've never had a paid listing get dropped out of yahoo. One former client has 19 sites in the same category.

oilman

11:46 pm on Mar 5, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>cash talks

yup - never been turned down either. Been kicked to the bottom of the pile for no reason but never rejected.

eljefe3

2:02 am on Mar 6, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



>>yup - never been turned down either

A client of mine got rejected due to the fact the the URL was too long and Netscape couldn't handle it. After a long wait on the phone to yahoo, all got cleared up and the sites were in. At $299 a pop, I don't think they want to turn down anyone.

markd

8:35 am on Mar 6, 2002 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Presumably, even if 'cash talks', if your site contains a Java/graphic nav, or uses features not backward compatible with v.4 browers it will still be rejected!

Some things will never change! :)