Forum Moderators: open
- Get more links
- Get deep links
- Wait
Can anyone who has gone from homepage-only to fully indexed share their experiences? For example:
- Has anyone been successful with a small number of quality inbounds and if so, how many of these were deep links?
- Has anyone managed to get a site fully indexed quickly? If so, what linking strategy was used?
I have 2 sites (both ~ 4 months old) which only have 4 and 5 pages indexed by Yahoo respectively. Slurp has deep crawled these sites a couple of times in the past month.
Our site was live Oct 2003 we are a substantial sized UK site, We must have 9-10k of links to it, Yahoo visits every day but takes little content to index - i think we have about 1% of our content in the index about 2700 pages.
I think its a case of keep waiting, it moves at snail pace and adds a few pages - some sites i know that have good percentage of pages indexed are in most cases over 5 yrs old. Others i know are in a similar boat.
Meanwhile i guess if you are a US site, that Yahoo will want you to use its premium index service where you pay per click in the SERPs but they index all of your pages for you.
Its amazing they can index youre entire site if your paying!
Can anyone who has gone from homepage-only to fully indexed share their experiences?
Welcome to the world of the yahoo penalty. Nothing seems to get you out of it. I have contacted them half a dozen times, and nothing.
Clean site, unique content, yahoo does not like it as its in a competitive industry.
Around Feb we went up to 1,800 and then 2,200 pages (our site now has about 140,000 pages of product which is database driven.
In the last few days it's been all over the place but generally up. Showing 6,000 right now but I have seen 12,000 and 14,000 as recently as hours ago. They are all over the place. I'm starting to think they don't have the resources or power to index a very large site. Google has 87,000 of our pages indexed for a comparison. It's not penalty in our case.... they are just using the out dated Inktomi system and slurp sucks to be blunt.
I just hope for the best now as we have learned to get by almost solely on our Google placements. We subtly make them pay by giving Google more of our advertising dollar (I know they don't care but it makes us feel better)
By looking at their index we would have probably would have been better off being an affiliate of ourselves rather than the main content site. Affiliates have completely spammed both indexes (Y & G) and got away with it. Hopefully they will wake up someday and realize what a mess the index has become.
Wow....when I rant.... I rant... I'll get off my soapbox now.
Our site is over 7 years old, has several hundred pages indexed by Google, hundreds of good inbound links from around the planet, but only one page is indexed by Yahoo.
Now this IS depressing. Definitely sounds like some sort of penalty.
Jaffstar, I see from another thread [webmasterworld.com], you used the re-review page [add.yahoo.com].
It's pretty disappointing they didn't even respond.
Did you previously have a decent amount of pages indexed or has it always been homepage only?
Let's assume for a minute both of you don't actually have a penalty - what are your linking characteristics?
- Number of links
- Rough PR of inbounds
- Ratio of homepage:deep
- Rato of one-way:reciprocal
- Anchor text variation
- Interlinking?
Well, this new site got fully indexed by Yahoo, and by Yahoo only. I still don't know how they discovered that site.
My other site, which has been around for about seven or so years, has gone through several revisions. For a while probably at least a year it went without updates, and I never kept track of how it did in SERPs until last March. Starting last March I went through the whole site, nothing big, and cleaned up the HTML, added some new content, and have gotten some quality inbound links (15-20).
This site, still will not get fully indexed, just the homepage. What's interesting is when I type the www.domain-name.com into Yahoo! the first two listings are my domain name but they have different descriptions, the first result is my META description only, the second is my META description and some extra on page text that Yahoo! pulled.
I sent an email to their search results help team (I think) but they never responded...
In the meantime, Google and MSN fully index the site, but of course, Google buries it in the SERPs, it makes wonder if somehow I got a penalty, I asked Google but got the generic reply...the site has gone through numerous changes over time, I've deleted pages, moved pages to different folders, redirect old pages to new location etc. Maybe I screwed myself over, but everything is much cleaner and organized, hopefully I can bring resserect this site but it's discouraging to see a lot of work get punished and not know why...
My attitude now is to go on as if Yahoo doesn't exist (that's what we had to do anyway for the last year). They wouldn't know how to crawl out of bed.
Did you previously have a decent amount of pages indexed or has it always been homepage only?
Yes, I had a few thousand pages indexed. The site also had about 20000 incoming 1 way links.
There is unfortunately no patern.
I have another site,which is dominating Yahoo, this site is new. New sites seem to do well.
I get next to nothing from MSN, despite being well indexed.
I just got my first deep crawl from Google in months after being smacked with a duplicate content penalty after screwing up a 301 (I think that's what happened anyway).
I'm beginning to think SEO is a giant colossal crapshoot.
The site is in a fairly competitive area, one which tends to have a lot of similar sites all with much the same auto-generated information, but also a fair few with original content. This one has almost all original content, most of which already existed offline and was just made available online at that time.
It is added to and updated daily, at least a page a day is added, usually more, sometimes 10-12. These are being quickly picked up and tend to be in Yahoo and getting referrals within a few days.
It is not a commercial site, in that it sells nothing directly, though it does have adsense on all pages and a few relevant affiliate links here and there. While it is not a 'made for adsense' site, the fact that adsense exists was part of the motivation for getting all the content online.
It was submitted to the Yahoo directory for a free listing about 6 weeks ago, accepted and given sunglasses. But they had indexed it and it was doing well with them before that. It is also in DMOZ and maybe 5 other relevant directories. There are no more than a half dozen other incoming links (excluding ODP clones and regional Yahoos). Links were not sought (yet) and have been acquired naturally.
While Yahoo send a lot of traffic it is not the top SE referrer, twice as much comes from Ask Jeeves. In the last 2 months Google referrals have started to rise from a low base, they are running about about 90% of Yahoo this month, whereas last month they were 60% and in April less than 20%. All natural serps, no adwords. MSN referrals on the other hand are falling off as a percentage of the total.
The domain was registered about 4 months before the site was live, but there was nothing on the home page, but the content was being put online behind that.
I don't know how useful that is - I have other sites that do far less well in Yahoo, so need to sit down and take a long look to see can I do the same with them! I was not, to be truthful, thinking about Yahoo at all when making this site, more about making it Google-friendly.
As far as links are concerned, it looks like a small number of high quality inbounds could be the way to go. Are all your links on-topic or just from respected sites (or both)? I'm guessing the key is to get a couple of links from sites that yahoo loves (high number of pages indexed, spidered regularly and ranking well). Sounds straight-forward but we know Yahoo can be particularly fickle...
Maybe the site just needs more links, maybe a Y! directory listing, etc.
Are all your links on-topic or just from respected sites (or both)?
All on topic. A couple from very well respected sites which are not in the same niche but which link to articles that overlap into theirs. A couple from sites that are a tiny niche within the site's niche, again to articles, not to home page.
I am also starting to get people with sites in a smaller niche than mine to write articles and exchange links that way, I am offering to write articles specifically for some sites also. In fact that is one of the main ways I intend to build links. It'll be slow, but I think of higher quality.
One other thing. The site links out very liberally, but from within articles or beside them, not from a links page (there isn't one). These outward links would pretty much all be to respected and established sites or to sites in such a tiny niche that they are pretty much the only ones in it. Many of the sites linked to are non-commercial and are hobby or enthusiasts sites.
Pages within the main domain are being indexed fine.
Just my 02