Forum Moderators: open
Not good.
I love INK!
"Our strategy was to do a good job on the 80 percent of common queries and ignore the other stuff," Gates said. But "it's the remaining 20 percent that counts," he added, "because that's where the quality perception is."
Gates promised not to make that mistake again.
[webmasterworld.com...]
Though too early to tell, Yahoo seems taking its turn to do this 80-20 mistake. For obscure vital searches, they are total cr*p, taking the web search several years back.
Though too early to tell, Yahoo seems taking its turn to do this 80-20 mistake. For obscure vital searches, they are total cr*p, taking the web search several years back.
yes, it is too early to tell.
Yahoo have to start somewhere by picking up the program then establishing it in the web site then building on it.
With Yahoo's money and power they won't be too far away from Google.
How much will the yahoo directory help support your rankings?
Will Yahoo dump their directory?
And what will be yahoo's next move now that they have dumped Google?
its going to be a busy year!
Just seen 3 versions of yahoo, pre-brandy, brandy and then Ink what fun we have today :)
[edited by: lasko at 2:18 pm (utc) on Feb. 17, 2004]
>when ink results are being showed is the "results provide by G" still their or the ink logo?
For the hour that I saw them (and I checked with my other office in Nottingham and they had them too) - there was no results provided statement at all.
>when ink results are being showed is the "results provide by G" still their or the ink logo?For the hour that I saw them (and I checked with my other office in Nottingham and they had them too) - there was no results provided statement at all.
I was looking at INK based results on Yahoo, and when I scrolled to the bottom I also saw "results provided by Google". They were definitely INK results because there were INK specific tracking IDs in the SERPs.