Forum Moderators: phranque
Ok it seems to be faster, but how do you measure this performance on a web server,
If the site in question is the one in your profile, I would consider shrinking that main image down by half, chopping it up into slices (big chunks are hard to fit into a skinny data pipe) or eliminating it altogether.
Another thing that I use is tiling to make the bars that the navigation buttons sit on if it's a fancy gradient bar, or just use html color if it's a plain block of color.
Blurry photos download way faster (smaller file size) and can look cool as a design element.
Shrinking the logo always helps.
If you want to get your code positively anorexic, eliminate white space in your code(this is easy if you have dreamweaver, get the extension). I think there's standalone software that can do it for you, or you can get macho with it and just do it by hand.
And my main advice, try not to mix gif type images with jpeg types, cuz that's what you got going on that page, and that makes for a bigger file size.
A few ideas...
scroll down and choose "hitbox doctor"
You can get an relative server response time by using the ping utility at Cnet.com. [webservices.cnet.com] It adds up ping response times from various locations around the country, then averages them together and compares them to similiar hosting services.