Forum Moderators: phranque
I'm worried though because google is not obeying the robots.txt. I have lots off disallows similar to the ones in:
[webmasterworld.com...]
but google is indexing profiles and other stuff I don't want it to!
Any reason why google is ignoring the robots.txt? It's been up there for months.
I have non forum directories and files disallowed and google obeys it, but for the forum, google is indexing everything.
I double checked the paths and file names. They are all correct.
Is this some kind of patern matching problem? .e.g. robots.txt has
disallow: /forum/profile.php
so that google will not read that exact filename but it will read
/forum/profile.php?u=100
due to not being an exact match?
To be honest, I don't think this is a phpbb problem. Google is not obeying robots.txt
It is probably related to the way phpbb outputs dynamic URLs, which is the problem.
When did you create your robots.txt? Googlebot does not grab it with every crawl. If it was added in the last month or so, you might need to wait until Googlebot decides to check your robots.txt file again.
It is probably related to the way phpbb outputs dynamic URLs, which is the problem
If that was the case then others would have the same problem and not just me I guess.
I'm sure I put the robots.txt file up there about 2 months ago when I applied the phpbb / google mod
(side note, will we be allowed to discuss phpbb when Best BBS is released? Being a competitor and such. )
Rogered
Google will INDEX any URL that is linked to, even if it does not SPIDER it due to the robots.txt file.
I don't understand that but I think you are right.
I have a .htaccess protected members area which is disallowed in the robots.txt and yet google is indexing the links even though it can't read them.
[webmasterworld.com...]
(side note, will we be allowed to discuss phpbb when Best BBS is released? Being a competitor and such. )
Moderator's note: This is still a help forum. Until that changes, technical help issuses can be discussed freely. "Is program A better than program B?" type discussions have been discouraged for a long time, that won't change. Invariably each program's author shows up to defend his product and the discussion becomes unproductive...