Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 23.20.223.88

Forum Moderators: open

Message Too Old, No Replies

Is SCSI Dead?

     
12:28 am on Dec 10, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member wheel is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 10+ Year Member



I just did a drive by of Dell to see what's going on in servers these days and notice two things. First, FSB of over 1000. Whoa! I must have been sleeping when we passed 533 :).

But I also noticed that none of their base servers where running scsi drives, only SATA.

Are SATA drives now considered faster and/or more reliable than SCSI drives? The last time I looked the consensus was that they were roughly similiar in speed, but not in quality.

1:02 am on Dec 10, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Administrator lifeinasia is a WebmasterWorld Top Contributor of All Time 5+ Year Member Top Contributors Of The Month



Most of them should have SAS drives in the customization section.
1:06 am on Dec 10, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



Nope, servers of quality are now using SAS (Serial Attached SCSI) drives. SATA drives are fine for desktop and even dedicated web servers, but most prefer SAS drives on web or other servers. Problem is they are expensive and not available in huge sizes compared to SATA drives.

All of Dell's server and workstation lines are available with SAS drives I believe.

[edited by: The_Contractor at 1:08 am (utc) on Dec. 10, 2008]

1:35 am on Dec 10, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



SAS allows to use SATA disks too.

SCSI's only remaining strong point right now is low latency (good for DB apps), however SSDs are becoming strong contender in this area.

SCSI is a loser for sure.

5:28 pm on Dec 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 5+ Year Member



well look how many years SCSI has been around.
6:30 pm on Dec 26, 2008 (gmt 0)

WebmasterWorld Senior Member 10+ Year Member



well look how many years SCSI has been around.

SCSI market is very limited and I'd say it is shrinking - historically SCSI disks were very expensive (per GB) but they had lower latency which is good for databases, so they held up in that market. These days however SSD is providing much lower latencies and prices are falling so SCSI will soon compete with SSD rather than SATA/SAS.

 

Featured Threads

Hot Threads This Week

Hot Threads This Month