Welcome to WebmasterWorld Guest from 184.108.40.206
Forum Moderators: open
I read people are preferring XP for Vista but almost all notebooks now are providing Vista only and I think, this will cost me only. Finally, XP is good or Vista?
Also, what are your idea about fingerprint locking technology, that some notebooks of Dell are providing; is this option not in HP?
Any model recommendations for HP? How's Sony Viao or Lenevo or something else.
I need an economical one, it should be very fast but HDD storage capacity, I don't really care. A fast CPU, a fast system bus and a fast memory or 2 to 4 GB is good for me.
As far as economical with lots or speed, memory, etc.. it's usually hard to come by so if you want something economical you'll have to sacrifice some of those other requirements.
I have an HP myself -- HP Compaq 8510w [h10010.www1.hp.com] -- and it is very nice for what I need.
I think ~15" monitor is better than 17" and HP notebooks are better than Dell. But what is quality difference in HP notebook and HP Compaq notebook?
I don't understand why Lenovo is costliest.
Presently, I've a Dell notebook; I donno why people say good about HP for Dell but Dell is performing nice to me for 3 years and I think, I should consider Dell also, if for same thing, Dell is lesser price than HP. My budget is around $700, I don't want to waste much on electronics because its becomes cheaper continously.
I heard a lot of great feedback about Sony Vaio but I guess it is for graphic, multimedia artists, for non-developers, non-programmers.
For me, it pretty much has to be Dell because they are virtually the only manufacturer of laptops with matte screens (instead of silly glossy screens). However, if you only work in soft light or are happy to see your own reflection, your choice is wider.
I hope Dell would be good for me because HP are costly, my budget is $700 and its not wise to spend too much on electronics.
Well, would like to know if opting Fedora core lieu Windows while purchase is possible? And will latest version of Fedora core is a good choice for a Windows addict? I'm a programmer so our remote machines or servers are always Linux, never Windows but for client machines or development of programs, we always use Windows XP.
My need is for software development and programming.
So, a very fast machine (this means speed of processor, memory, bus) is good for me.
You can run multiple OSs off of the main OS without all the rebooting hassles.
VMware will be good for me as this is required in my current project also. [For e.g., once our server was down showing IP 0.0.0.0, someone did some VMware thing, and it got non-zero IP, it started working.]
I'll find out VMware information on Google search and with laptop vendor. If you can point me some links, it will be more easy. Actually, I heard VMware thing just 10 days before, when I got introduced into recent project, so I'm not knowing it.
Many thanks Bill.
Now, if I needed to test under Windows 98, Virtual PC would be perfect (because Windows 98 won't recognise modern hardware).
Of course, Virtual PC has other advantages, such as being able to create an isolated virtual machine for security purposes, but that's another discussion altogether.
I only tried it fairly briefly. It worked quite well, ok for testing most stuff probably but I wouldn't want to use it when doing proper debugging work. It does some clever stuff like mapping wireless adapters into standard network adapters, but I can reboot in a couple of minutes and I mostly know where compatibility issues are likely to arise so I don't find I need it.
However, don't let me put you off, you may find you absolutely love it.
The VMware site has a large and active community forum that could be a good resource for you.
I hope, we're talking about making our simple personal use XP machine into a Virtual machine, so what should I download from [vmware.com...] ?